Showing posts with label
Rendezvous with French Cinema '24.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
Rendezvous with French Cinema '24.
Show all posts
Where is that “toxic masculinity” when we need it? You will ask too, after
spending time with Marc Becker, an overly sensitive man-child, whose
self-centered artistic pretentions will cause more angst and frustration for
those around him than any macho swaggering ever could. Becker has a twee
artistic vision for his work-in-progress film, but he appears psychologically incapable
of finishing it, despite the labors of his inexplicably loyal enablers in
Michel Gondry’s The Book of Solutions, which screens during this year’s
Rendez-Vous with French Cinema.
The
indie production company bankrolling Becker’s debut film just got a look at his
incomprehensible four-hours-plus cut and understandably decided to re-edit it
themselves, to hopefully salvage something. Instead, Becker, Charlotte, his faithful
editor, and Sylvia, the producer he treats like an assistant, go rogue, bundling
up all the hard drives, so they can finish the film guerilla style in the
country home owned by Becker’s Aunt Denise.
Lovely
Aunt Denise immediately sympathizes with the other two women, because she has
been putting up with Becker’s delusional self-indulgence for years. Unfortunately,
returning to her welcoming farmhouse exposes Becker to a host of fresh
distractions, like his old “Book of Solutions” an amateurish collection of
aphorisms intended to serve as a blueprint for life, but in fact, consists of a
laundry list of counterproductive instructions, like “always drive in second
gear.”
This
“love-letter” to cinema desperately needed a sternly worded studio memo. Book
of Solutions is so quirky and precious, it will make you retch your guts
out. Apparently, the running time is only 103 minutes, but it feels like it
drags on for four or five hours. This is not what love for cinema should look
like. In contrast, Kim Jee-won also follows a difficult filmmaker struggling to
realize an idiosyncratic vision in Cobweb, which considerably bolder,
smarter, edgier, and more visually striking (as well as infinitely more
watchable).
If a Saudi prince is willing to (allegedly?) assassinate a prominent
journalist like Jamal Khashoggi, what do think the royal family might do to
punish a working-class gang from a French housing complex? The poor knuckleheads
do not realize the implications of stealing from the royal family until it is
too late in director-screenwriter Rabah Ameur-Zaimeche’s The Temple Woods
Gang, which screens during this year’s Rendez-Vous with French Cinema.
Bebe’s
gang are small-time criminals, but they are not such bad guys. In fact,
Monsieur Pons rather likes his lunkheaded fellow residents of the Temple Woods project.
They were always polite to his recently deceased mother and despite some
good-natured ribbing, always show respect to the veteran. Yes, Pons served in
Africa, as a sniper—a fact that might be significant later.
While
Pons mourns his mother, Bebe’s crew plans and successfully executes a hold-up of
the prince’s courier. They were interested in the suitcases full of cash, but
the prince is more worried about the cache of sensitive documents. In fact, he
is so offended by their disrespect, he has his fixer call in Jim, the family enforcer,
to teach them a lesson. Frankly, the blokes do not even notice the papers until
things get ugly and brutal. (If there is one lesson to draw from Temple Woods
it is if you ever find yourself unexpectedly holding secret Saudi
documents, head directly to the Israeli embassy, which these guys never think
to do.)
Temple
Woods is
not really a heist or a payback movie. Instead, it is an extremely moody
exploration of urban angst and violence. Ameur-Zaimeche de-emphasizes action, quickly
staging the carjacking, but devoting considerably more time to two musically-focused
scenes. There is method to the madness, because real-life vocalist Annkrist’s rendition
of her song “La beaute du jour” during the funeral for Mother Pons is
arrestingly beautiful. Watching the
prince get down to an Algerian Rai DJ is far less potent.
In
fact, Annkrist might just qualify as the star of Temple Woods, but Regis
Laroche is memorably both humane and steely as the sad, middle-aged Pons. Although
played by thesps with widely varying degrees of professional experience, the
Temple Woods guys all look and sound like real knock-around street toughs.
Blanche Renard’s husband is so controlling, you have to wonder how he keeps his
job. The constant calls and surprise visits must take time away from his banker
work. Regardless, he definitely keeps her under his thumb, steadily depleting
her resolve to resist. Of course, he was initially all charm as viewers see in Valerie
Donzelli’s Just the Two of Us, which screens during this year’s
Rendez-Vous with French Cinema.
Blanche’s
identical twin Rose was a little skeptical when Gregoire Lamoureux swept her
sister off her feet, but she mostly kept her doubts to herself. Of course, the
courtship was appropriately romantic, but soon after their marriage, he
relocates them to a northern provincial town, blaming an unwelcome transfer. The
arrival of their young daughter distracts Renard, but around young Stella’s
fifth birthday, she decides it is time to go back to work. Clearly, Lamoureux
does not approve, but she still has enough will of her own to apply for and
accept and teaching position.
From
then on, things are different. Lamoureux obsesses over every perceived flaw and
guilt trips her relentlessly. He calls her at work relentlessly (to such an
extent her co-workers really should be suspecting something). The controlling
and emotional abuse grows so severe, Blanche secretly arranges a date with a
stranger via an app, as a desperate act of defiance and a reality check.
Indeed, she confirms not all men are like Lamoureux. Unfortunately, Jerome
Vierson is such a decent guy and attentive lover, Renard gives herself away.
Just
the Two of Us (no
connection to Grover Washington Jr.) sounds like a conventional kitchen sink
drama, but stylistically, it feels very different. Labeling it an “erotic
thriller” is wildly misleading. However, cinematographer Laurent Tangy’s
extremely intimate framing and washed-out color palette gives the present-day
film a 1970s vibe. At times it almost resembles found footage. It is
distracting for five minutes or so, but over time, the claustrophobic
atmosphere creates a feeling of entrapped solidarity with Renard. Frankly, it
is difficult to breathe during the stressful third act.
Frankly,
Donzelli engages in some shameless manipulation, but she maintains such an
elevated level of tension, she gets away with it. The celebrated cast also completely
shed their famous images and submerge themselves into the domestic pressure
cooker. Virginie Efira creates two very distinct personas as the Renard sisters.
Rose is refreshingly forceful, whereas Blanche desperate descent is absolutely
harrowing to witness.
Obviously, Egon Schiele is not creating anymore paintings. In 2010, the contested
ownership of the Nazi-looted “Portrait of Wally” resulted in a $19 million
settlement to heirs of the rightful owners. It is therefore easy to understand
why a hotshot art specialist would be excited by the prospect of finding a
presumed lost Schiele painting. Finding it is one thing. Successfully
auctioning it will prove to be another thing entirely in director-screenwriter
Pascal Bonitzer’s Auction, which screens during this year’s Rendez-Vouswith French Cinema.
Andre
Masson is ruthlessly ambitious and sometimes kind of slimy, but in his way, he
is always honest (often brutally so, in fact). In contrast, his new intern
Aurore seems to be a compulsive liar, but she is smart, so Masson is not quite
prepared to cut her loose yet. When a lawyer in provincial Mulhouse contacts
him, requesting the authentication of an apparent Schiele in the possession of
her client, a young manual laborer, he assumes it must be a hoax. Nevertheless,
he and his ex, Bettina (who is now essentially his best friend), make a road
trip to appraise it out of courtesy. To their shock and delight, they find a genuine
Schiele considered lost since WWII.
It
turns out, the young factory worker and his widowed mother bought their modest
house from the estate of an old Vichy-era collaborator. Rather fatefully, all
the junky contents of the storage shed came with it, including the painting
that Masson believes should go for well over ten million Euros if his auction
house can secure the sale. To seal the deal, Masson must also negotiate with
the American heirs of the original gallerist owners, who have much stronger
legal standing than the mother and son in Mulhouse.
Auction
is
a remarkably assured and accomplished film that could very well turn out to be
one of the best of the year. It is built around a richly complex character
study of Masson, who quickly proves to be a much more compelling and weirdly
sympathetic figure than his initial appearance suggests. Yet, Bonitzer’s
screenplay is also very definitely about something. There is real suspense in
this tale of auction house intrigue, as well as a genuinely idealistic love for
great art. Frankly, Auction is one of those rare films that you walk out
of marveling at the sharpness of the writing.
Fantasy often tells us mankind is the most dangerous animal. If you think that
changes when a mysterious phenomenon starts mutating the afflicted into
physically powerful human-animal hybrids, you could not be more wrong. Homo-sapiens
are still the most dangerous creatures, due to our aggression, fear, and
prejudice, a point that is repeatedly emphasized in Thomas Cailley’s The
Animal Kingdom, the opening night film of this year’s Rendez-Vous with French Cinema, in New York.
As
the film opens, Emile Marindaze is distressed by the sight of a bird-man
struggling with paramedics amid cars stuck in traffic. His alarm seems natural,
but viewers soon learn his reaction is more personal and visceral. It turns out
his mother has also been stricken with the strange animal mutating disease,
which carries a severe stigma among the uninfected.
His
father François has arranged for them to temporarily relocate to a resort
village, so they can be close to her in the newly constructed high-security
treatment center. Of course, they want to keep her condition on the down-low,
so they pretend they are simply in town for dad’s new job as a chef at a
waterfront bistro. It becomes harder when the initial shipment of
patient/inmates (including Madame Marindaze) escapes in a traffic accident.
Emile regularly drags Emile out to the forest to search for his mother, while
the surly teen is trying to hide his own early onset of animal mutation
symptoms.
So,
deep down, we’re all animals. The end. There is a legit point in there, which
someone like Rod Serling could have made brilliantly in just under thirty
minutes. In contrast, Cailley drags out this morality play—but to his credit,
he reportedly cut an epilogue after Animal Kingdom premiered at Cannes.
That
is the storytelling. On the other hand, the filmmaking that went into Animal
Kingdom is often pretty impressive. Cailley’s brand of contemporary fantasy
is eerily realistic looking. In some ways, Animal Kingdom almost functions
as Cronenbergian body-horror, but the mutations are vividly lifelike and
painful looking.