Anyone who sold 100 million albums qualifies as a singer of “popular music.” For the
ten million people who saw him perform live, Luciano Pavarotti was the voice
and face of opera, even more so than Andrea Bocelli, whose career Pavarotti
helped launch. He is sort of like the Louis Armstrong of opera, popular with
listeners who otherwise never listen to their styles of music. (They also both
performed with handkerchiefs.) Even if they already recognize the great tenor,
viewers will learn a good deal about his life and music in Ron Howard’s
documentary, Pavarotti (where the above figures were cited), which screens
as part of the Ron Howard Retrospective at the JBFC.
Perhaps
somewhat anticlimactically, Howard starts with the film’s best sequence, incorporating
amateur video of Pavarotti’s impromptu concert in the Teatro Amazonas, the
world class opera house built literally in the middle of Brazil’s Amazon region.
Howard then rewinds to chronicle Pavarotti’s rise to fame. It seems strange in
retrospect, but Pavarotti was one of the first stars of the American Express “do
you know me?” commercials.
Of
course, just about everyone would soon know Pavarotti, thanks to his ambitious
concert promoters, who found Pavarotti could draw just as well as rock stars.
In fact, the tenor was recruited for his first stadium engagement when Bruce
Springsteen backed out of his commitment, leaving the London concert producer
holding the bag.
Howard
has no shortage of material to draw from Pavarotti’s appearances with Johnny
Carson, Phil Doahue, and pretty much all the morning show hosts of the 1980s.
However, the film ignores his dramatic, non-operatic big screen debut in the
widely panned Yes, Giorgio, maybe because nobody involved wanted to talk
about it.
Yet, in
general, Howard covers the bad times as well as the good. He fully examines the
circumstances surrounding Pavarotti’s divorce and his romance with Nicoletta Mantovani,
whom the Italian press rather unfairly characterized as a homewrecker. (Howard clearly
establishes that she wasn’t Pavarotti’s first affair.) The film also acknowledges—and
takes issue—with the late career criticism Pavarotti endured from opera purists.
Indeed, Bono uses language jazz fans would appreciate to argue real artists use
their life experience to interpret a song, which is what he heard in the mature
Pavarotti.
In the 1930's, the Germans had a nasty habit of fighting with their neighbors. That was
even true of the small colony on Floreana Island in the Galapagos. Would-be
philosopher Friedrich Ritter and his partner Dore Strauch only had six neighbors,
but they fought with all of them. The feuding took a scandalous turn that
stoked decades of controversy in the German press and spawned three films. One
was a French TV movie adapting a Georges Simenon novel transparently based on
the case. The second was the classy “true-crime” documentary” The Galapagos
Affair: Satan Came to Eden. This is the third. Director-producer Ron Howard
recruited a famous cast, but like previous filmmakers, he shows strangely
little interest in the Germany the Floreanans had expatriated themselves from
in Eden, which opens Friday in theaters.
Strauch
believes Ritter will save the world with his manifesto, but to contemporary
ears, it sounds like a warmed-over fusion of Nietzsche and Rousseau, at least
before he goes a little crazy. Heinz and Margaret Wittmer are the next to arrive.
The couple seems to have an inkling of how bad things will get in Germany. They
also believe their ailing son Harry will benefit from the tropical climate. The
Rittmer’s instinctively look down on their square, middle-class neighbors, but
they grudgingly start to respect the Wittmers for doggedly scraping out a home
for themselves.
Unfortunately,
“Baroness” Eloise Bosquet de Wagner Wehrhorn lands several months later, along
with her two himbo lovers. She has grandiose plans to build a beach resort, but
she is ill-prepared for the conditions she finds. As the self-dubbed Baroness’s
supplies dwindle, she and her men set their eyes on the Wittmers’ supplies,
making them a direct existential threat to the family. Yet, Ritter probably
hates her even more, because of the way the Baroness needles his vanity.
Screenwriter
Noah Pink offers explanations for the deaths on Floreana, but in real-life (if
such a thing still exists), the truth has yet to be established beyond a shadow
of a doubt. That is a large part of the story’s appeal. Regardless, despite its
ultimate uncertainty, The Galapagos Affair is a much better film, in
part due to a more sophisticated vibe (suggesting comparisons to Michael
Bradford’s White Mischief). In contrast, Howard aims more for the overheated
tone of an old school primetime soap opera. Frankly, he and Pink frequently
neglect the mystery/thriller elements, focusing instead of the island’s
festering jealousies, sexual power games, and [not-so]-micro aggressions. Consequently,
it is often grabby, but in a lurid kind of way.
Jude
Law is certainly fun to watch shamelessly chewing the scenery as the arrogant
and wildly self-important Ritter. Daniel Bruhl anchors the film, portraying
Heinz Wittmer with dignity and intensity that it maybe does not fully deserve. To
her credit, Sydney Sweeney so thoroughly transforms herself into the hardscrabble
Margaret Wittmer, a perpetually offended wokester could watch the entire film
without getting “triggered”—at least not by Sweeney and her “good jeans.”
In a
way, you could say Continental Studios’ upcoming tent-pole is sort of a Marvel
movie, because back in the 1980s, Marvel Comics released five promotional
comics featuring the Kool-Aid Man. It was a little weird at the time, but a
big-budget Kool-Aid Man movie is a daunting task for Matt Remick, but he had to
feign enthusiasm to get promoted to run the studio. He wants to be Robert
Evans, but his insecurities are only too obvious in writer-creators Seth Rogan,
Evan Goldberg, Peter Huyck, Alex Gregory, and Frida Perez’s 10-episode The
Studio, which premieres today on Apple TV+.
Remick
loves movies, so he wants his talent to love him back. Instead, they usually
blow him off, at least until sleazy CEO, Griffin Mill, promotes him to studio chief,
replacing his mentor, Patty Leigh. However, Remick soon offers her a lucrative
producing deal to keep her in the fold. He will have many challenges
shepherding Kool-Aid, as well as the rest of his upcoming slate,
including Ron Howard’s Alphabet City and a Sarah Polley art film.
Fortunately,
his core staff remains more-or-less loyal to him, including his hard-drinking
buddy Sal Saperstein, his freshly promoted former assistant Quinn Hackett, and
the caustic head of marketing, Maya Mason.
Obviously,
The Studio takes a great deal of inspiration from Robert Altman’s The
Player. It even pays homage to Tim Robbins’ character, the original Griffin
Mill. It also features many real-life show business celebrities playing
themselves, but some are considerably funnier than others. Frankly, the
surprise scene-stealer is Dave Franco (as himself), who pokes fun at his image
and career, while going for some big laughs. He even provides perhaps the funniest
recap narration in TV history for the concluding episode, a two-part
continuation.
Zoe
Kravitz is also a very good sport. However, even though filmmaking legends Ron
Howard and Martin Scorsese fully commit, their storylines are more cringy than
humorous.
Indeed,
the writing and execution varies wildly throughout the ten installments. The opener
is an okay set-up, but episodes two, three, five, and six set-up excruciatingly
uncomfortable situations that just keep piling on, rather than puncturing the
tension. However, episode seven has some of the funniest TV/streaming writing
of the 2020s that absolutely skewers Hollywood’s DEI mindset. Honestly, there
is no way this episode could have been produced three or four years ago. Ice
Cube is also savagely funny as himself.
The
two-part conclusion, set during CinemaCon, is also vintage door-slamming farce
that even pays tribute to Weekend at Bernie’s. It is mostly either feast
or famine with The Studio, but episode four, “The Missing Reel,” is sort
of an okay middle of the road offering, mostly because Zac Efron’s droll self-portrayal.
It also somewhat amusingly uses elements of film noir.