After three seasons of therapy sessions, you would think Prof. Jasper Tempest
would have made some progress overcoming his OCD quirks. Unfortunately, he started
making headway by the third season, but then the murder of his former student
and primary police contact Lisa Donckers sent him spiraling backwards. Tempest’s
shrink, Dr. Helena Goldberg, initially recommends a return to crime-solving as
therapy, but she will also request his consulting detective expertise for
personal reasons in “Overboard,” which launches the fourth season of Professor
T, premiering tonight on PBS.
A death
on a cruise ship is a premise worthy of Dame Agatha. However, initially only
rookie DS Chloe Highsmith suspects foul play in the presumed drowning of Ophelia
McQueen. To be fair, DS (and acting DI) Dan Winters might be a bit distracted mourning
Donckers, with whom he had a rather complicated relationship. However,
revelations of some nasty texts and further suspicious circumstances prompt a
more pointed investigation.
It
turns out, Dr. Goldberg is an old friend of McQueen’s mother, so she would like
Tempest to apply his anti-social genius to the case. Of course, Tempest is
incapable of responding with grace, but eventually he starts his own
investigation, with all the prickliness of his first season self. At this point,
the only person of his limited social circle willing to help happens to be his
free-spirited Aunt Zelda Radclyffe, who agreed to visit while Tempest’s mother
tours Europe. Frankly, she really came more for the dog, but she can drive.
Fortunately,
this will be a case Tempest can solve like Nero Wolfe, without access to the
crime scene. Yet, he still gets himself into trouble. Regardless, writer
Stephen Brady pens some clever parsing of witness statements. Still, it seems
like this episode fails to capitalize on a promising crime scene. However, it
accomplishes its primary goal: getting Tempest back in the game.
Michelangelo is often called a “Renaissance Man,” but he lived well into the Reformation.
Fittingly, some of the talking heads dub his The Last Judgement a great
work of Reformation art, because it is all about sinners burning you know where.
Maybe even Savonarola would have approved—but probably not. Of course,
Savonarola was very much a part of the Renaissance Era, if not its spirit.
Indeed, the violence he unleashed fits right in with dual themes of
director-producer Emma Frank’s three-part Renaissance: The Blood and the
Beauty, which premieres tomorrow on PBS.
Poor
Botticelli and Donatello might feel left out, because Frank largely focuses on Michelangelo’s
professional rivalries with Da Vinci and Raphael. Clearly, Frank favors Team
Michelangelo, since she incorporates dramatic monologues performed by Charles
Dance, in the persona and costume of Michelangelo, adapted from the artist’s
own writings. Indeed, Michelangelo had to compete against Da Vinci’s lofty
reputation and Raphael’s political acumen, but he outlasted them both.
Frank
and company frequently remind viewers of the dangers that came with living in
the late 1400s, but that should not come as a great revelation to anyone who
watched CW’s Leonardo. After all, both Da Vinci and Michelangelo secured
good paying patronage work designing arms and fortifications.
Although
wider in scope, The Blood and the Beauty feels a lot like Ken Burns’ Leonardo da Vinci, but with less impressive experts. Weirdly, Frank assembles a
number of filmmakers and a “sex historian” (spare us, please) to compliment usual
suspects like Walter Isaacson. (Burns’ film also features more distinctive
music and narration, thanks to the contributions of Keth David and Caroline
Shaw.)
His iconic
canine reportedly lent his name to the so-called “Blue Dog Coalition” of [mostly]
Southern centrist Democrats that hardly exists anymore (ten and dwindling). More
fittingly, George Rodrigue’s popular character has been pictured with many of New
Orleans’ favorite sons, such as Louis Armstrong and Al Hirt. He has become a
symbol of Louisiana, but before the Blue Dog, Rodrigue also preserved evocative
images of his Cajun heritage. Sean O’Malley chronicles his life and work in Blue:
The Life and Art of George Rodrigue, which premieres this Thursday on
participating PBS stations.
Everyone
knows the Blue Dog from national ad campaigns commissioned by the likes of
Xerox and Absolut. He also hangs in major museums, but establishment acceptance
took quite a while. Blue Dog just seemed like too much fun to be serious art.
Yet, those big eyes have a haunting vibe.
Regardless,
O’Malley and company rightfully take considerable time establishing the
importance of his earlier work, depicting the everyday life of Cajuns, as well
as their folklore. In fact, the Blue Dog originally came out of his folkloric
output, originating as a depiction of the loup-garou for a book of spooky
tales.
Arguably,
the portrait that emerges of Rodrigue most likely conforms to the expectations
of viewers and admirers. He came from modest means and overcame considerable adversity
to become one of America’s most recognizable artists. He had a passion for life
and New Orleans Saints football, but Hurricane Katrina’s tragic impact on his
community sent Rodrigue into a deep depression.
He made
the original selfies possible. His company’s instant photography provided
immediate gratification, but their photos were still developed on film, so
people generally saved it for moments that meant something. His company gave
Kodak a run for its money and remains fondly remembered. The entrepreneurial
career of Edwin Land and the rise and fall of the company he created are
chronicled in director-writer Gene Tempest’s Mr. Polaroid, which airs
this Monday as part of the current season of American Experience on PBS.
Tempest
almost immediately likens Land, a Harvard drop-out, to some of the tech titans
who followed his example, like Jobs and Gates. The comparison is apt. Land
started his company developing a polarization technique to minimize car
headlight glare. Detroit was not interested, so he ap[plied his technology to
other uses, including gun-sights, which led to major defense contracts during
WWII. Of course, he knew (and hoped) the war would not last forever, so he started
R&D on his instant photography concept.
Eventually,
Land launched Polaroid’s first instant camera at a media event that had serious
Steve Jobs vibes. At the time, it was big and bulky, but the news photographers
were still dazzled. However, it took years before Polaroid refined the process
into a handheld device. He also pioneered the more laidback corporate culture
that continues to be associated with the tech sector. Yet, Tempest still found plenty
of former employees to complain about Land’s policies.
Ironically,
Land was unusually progressive for his time, especially in his efforts to hire
and promote women and black recruits. Nevertheless, some employees were
apparently resentful that Land did not completely adopt every single one of
their political positions. Yet, he clearly had a greater social conscience than
many of his contemporaries, while also serving as unofficial technical advisor
to the U.S. government on aerial surveillance photography.
Sergei
Rachmaninoff reinvented himself more profoundly than Madonna ever has. Shortly
after the Bolshevik revolution, the Rachmaninoff family was exiled with the
only the contents of their luggage to their name (but it was a good name). Due
to the economics of music publishing at the time, Rachmaninoff could not viably
support his family as composer in America, so he launched a second career as a
concert pianist, from basically nothing. Of course, he still had his reputation—and
his freedom. Violinist Scott Yoo and his guests celebrate Rachmaninoff’s second
life in America (and his summers on Lake Lucerne) in Rachmaninoff Reborn,
the latest episode of the Great Performances sub-series, Now Hear
This, which airs this Friday on PBS.
While
they do not belabor the horrors of Communism, Yoo and company clearly assert a
Romantic composer like Rachmaninoff could never meaningfully create under the rigid
Socialist Realist aesthetics mandated by the new regime. He was lucky to get
out while the getting was good. Indeed, Russian-born, British-naturalized
pianist draws painful parallels between Rachmaninoff’s expatriation and the experiences
of contemporary Russian artists forced into exile under Putin.
At the
age of 44, Rachmaninoff essentially launched his concert career, quickly
becoming one of the world’s most popular performers. Yoo and his experts argue
Rachmaninoff succeeded because he had the talent. He was also one of the
earliest musicians with the recorded legacy to prove it, including early 78s
and a vintage player-piano roll, which are presented during special listening
sessions.
As
Ukrainian-American photographer explains, Rachmaninoff was also an early
adopter of technology, so he left a wealth of photographs documenting his family
during casual moments. Frankly, it is remarkable how well documented his life
was, entirely because the traditional old Russian aristocrat was so receptive
to the fruits of modernism, even including psychoanalysis.
Simon
Schama became one of the unlikeliest bestsellers of 1989, when Citizens,
his nearly thousand-page history of the French Revolution hit the NY Times list.
He subsequently became one of the leading chroniclers of the Jewish people. However,
he always tried to avoid presenting their history as a “march” towards the
Holocaust. Nevertheless, at some point, the enormity of it becomes inescapable.
The eighty-year-old historian explains the tragic history of the Holocaust, from
the places where it happened in Simon Schama: The Holocaust, 80 Years On,
directed by Hugo Macgregor, which airs this Tuesday on PBS.
Schama
begins with some grim statistics that explain why this program is so needed: “nearly
a quarter of young Americans believe the holocaust did not happen, or has been exaggerated,”
that would be the student “activists” turning campuses into cauldrons of hate,
and “one in twenty Britons think the Holocaust never happened.”
As you
can see from the art provided, Schama eventually takes viewers to
Auschwitz-Birkenau, but he starts in Kaunas, Lithuania, which he identifies as the
first major city occupied by the Germans, where the locals voluntarily and
enthusiastically massacred their fellow Jewish citizens, under the watchful,
approving eyes of the National Socialists. The killing was not as systematized
and industrialized as it was in concentration camps, but it would be impossible
for the local populace to deny their culpability.
Yes,
dreadfully, pogroms were not uncommon throughout Eastern Europe during the
decades and even centuries preceding WWII. That is why Schama emphasizes the
case of the Netherlands, which was considered a haven of tolerance, much like
Britain across the North Sea. Yet, despite initial acts of solidarity, Dutch Jewry
suffered the highest mortality rate of any Western European nation during the
Holocaust—a grim 75%.
The
example of the Netherlands seems particularly applicable to our current times.
Nobody thought something like that could happen there, but it did. Do you
really think it couldn’t happen here, when the Jewish Governor of Pennsylvania
and his family are targeted in an explicit act of political terror, with
practically no media outrage once the motives were uncovered?
Art
Spiegelman helped force the world to remember some of its darkest history, with
his Pulitzer-Prize-winning graphic novel, Maus. Essentially, he adapted
his parents’ tragic real-life experiences during the Holocaust, but he anthropomorphized
the Jews as mice and the National Socialists as cats. Yet, this film has a
weirdly selective relationship with recent history. It ends before the October
7th terror attacks that are widely recognized as the largest mass-killing
of Jews since the Holocaust. However, the filmmakers managed to find time to
edit out Neil Gaiman’s appearance, which caused some consternation when the
film screened at festivals, presumably due to assault allegations against the
English author. Regardless, there is an inescapable feeling of prematureness to
Molly Bernstein & Philip Dolin’s Art Spiegelman: Disaster is My Muse,
which airs tomorrow on PBS, as part of the current season of American
Masters.
The
first forty-five minutes or so of Disaster is quite strong, because it really
focuses on the past, without attempting to score political points in the
present. Spiegelman retraces his career, starting with an internship at Topps
collector cards that led to a long-standing freelance relationship. He became
one of the stars of the underground comix movement, along with his late friend,
R. Crumb, whom we see attending a dinner party at Spiegelman’s.
For
over a decade, Spiegelman worked on the two-volume Maus, continually
interviewing and re-interviewing his father, since his mother had died under
painful circumstances during his childhood. Spiegelman is the first to admit he
was shocked by the reception, including best-seller lists and the Pulitzer
Prize. Arguably, the timing was just right since publication of the two volumes
in 1986 and 1991, releasing between Claude Lanzmann’s Shoah (1985) and
Spielberg’s Schindler’s List (1993), a period when mainstream readers
really started educating themselves on the full implications of the Shoah.
The
second half of Disaster largely focuses on Spiegelman coming to terms
with his unexpected success and figuring out what to do next. Arguably, his
lack of focus was detrimental to Bernstein & Dolin’s profile as well.
Eventually, they present him as an impassioned warrior against censorship, but
such terms are somewhat disingenuous. There are no laws against reading any
books in Texas or Florida (the two states primarily mentioned). Certain school boards
have, ill-advisedly, decided certain titles are not appropriate for young readers.
The fact that Maus was one such title is foolish irony that discredits their
entire judgement—yet, the fact remains school boards make these kind of
decisions everyday, in one direction or another, because space and acquisition
budgets are limited.

It is
not a coincidence bass players are so well represented in this documentary. Funk
would not be funk without those funky bass lines, so naturally bassists like
Marcus Miller, Christian McBride, Michael Veal, and Carlos Alomar are happy to
talk about the groovy music. McBride is best known for jazz and Miller has played
just about everything, but they were all influenced by funk greats like Larry
Graham and Bootsy Collins. Of course, everyone was also influenced by James
Brown, who continues to shape music, particularly hip hop, as the most sampled
recording artist of all-time (unless you count Clyde Stubblefield, the actual
drummer on Brown’s “Funky Drummer” track). Regardless, filmmakers Stanley
Nelson & Nicole London chronicle the incredibly danceable music in “We Want
the Funk,” which airs tomorrow on PBS, as part of the current season of Independent
Lens.
As the
battery of bassists explain, funk was built on a deceptively simple sounding groove.
However, really locking into the rhythmic patterns required a lot of rehearsal.
Alomar would know, because he was hired (and fired) by James Brown. Funk
decidedly contrasted with the more “genteel” and scrupulously non-political Motown,
as the somewhat polemical opening explains. (However, nobody mentions James
Brown’s later endorsement of Richard Nixon).
Nelson,
London, and their cast of expert musicians do a nice job explaining how
innovators like George Clinton of Parliament-Funkadelic and Sly Stone developed
the sounds that became funk, while the messages of James Brown’s anthems such
as “Say It Loud” captured the zeitgeist of their era. Brown also became an
international sensation, who was beloved throughout the newly independent
African nations.
Similarly,
Nelson and London explain how African artists like Fela Kuti and Manu Dibango
(who also sounded pretty “jazzy”) synthesized American funk, fused it with
their Afrobeat and “Makossa” styles, and then successfully re-imported their funk
back to American listeners. There is also some nice coverage of Afrofuturistic
expressions in funk, which references the great avant-garde jazz bandleader
(and self-proclaimed Saturn resident) Sun Ra.

Hazel
Scott led a working trio that featured genuine jazz legends as sidemen: Max Roach
on drums and Charles Mingus on bass. They even released a classic LP on the
Debut Records label, which was founded by Mingus and Roach. In the 1930s and
1940s, she was one of the most famous jazz musicians in American, but the
public largely forgot her during her expatriate period in France. Director-producer
Nicole London and Scott’s admirers (as well as her son) take stock of her life
and legacy in The Disappearance of Miss Scott, which airs this Friday on
PBS as part of the current season of American Masters.
Scott
was a true prodigy, whose notoriety grew steadily since she first performed
professionally as a young child. However, her friend Billie Holiday boasted her
to a new level when she arranged for Scott to replace her as the headliner at
Barney Josephson’s Café Society. At the height of her fame, Scott had the clout
to demand integrated audiences, even when she toured the deep south. She also
attracted the eye of Congressman Adam Clayton Powell.
At the
time, they were a way more glamorous political and entertainment power couple
than Cheryl Hines and RFK Jr. ever were. However, they drifted apart,
especially when her tour of France turned into an extended residency.
Rightfully,
London’s cast of commentators make a big deal out of Scott’s weekly television
show, which did indeed predate Nat King Cole’s by several years. She definitely
deserved recognition as TV’s first weekly Black primetime host. However, they
somewhat misleadingly make it sound like it was an act of vindictiveness when
all tapes of her show were trashed. Tragically, that happened to almost every
single episode of original programming that was broadcast on the defunct Dumont
Television Network, also sadly including The Gallery of Madame Liu-Tsong,
starring Anna Mae Wong, which was the first dramatic series starring an Asian
American woman as the lead character.
Fortunately,
the talking heads better understand musical history, particularly Jason Moran,
who has become a PBS go-to. Scott herself would probably enjoy watching him
demonstrate stride and boogie-woogie, both of which she was more proficient in.
In the
late 1990’s, Marsalis was at the peak of his prestige and influence. He already
received the Pulitzer Prize for Blood on the Fields. With the turn of
the Millennium approaching, Columbia released nine ambitious albums from
Marsalis, under the banner of “Swinging into the 21st.” None was
more ambitious than All Rise, commissioned by Kurt Masur, of the New
York Philharmonic, in memory of his schoolboy days under the Nazi and East
German Communist regimes. Yet, it would have its concert debut shortly after
9/11. Nearly a quarter century later, Marsalis staged a concert performance at
Chautauqua, during the reflective season following the brutal attack on Salman
Rushdie. It also happened to be one of those big round number anniversaries.
Chautauqua takes stock of itself while listening to Marsalis in Chautauqua
at 150: Wynton Marsalis’ All Rise, which airs this Tuesday on PBS.
Founded
in 1874, the Chautauqua Institute was a product of the Lyceum movement that
survived to this day, thanks to its pleasant location and the prominent faculty
and presenters it attracts. Several staffers boast the Institute fosters
dialogue that encourages understanding among partisans of each other’s
positions. Everyone says they learn so much, but nobody actually explains how
they changed mind after listening to the other side at Chautauqua. Of course,
there is a multi-faith program that talks about phobias and isms rather than
human rights and freedoms. Then, on August 22, 2022, Rushdie was attacked so brutally,
he spent days on a ventilator and ultimately lost an eye.
To its
credit, Chautauqua at 150 spends considerable time covering the attack
and its aftermath, but it declines to mention the Institution deliberately refused
to implement recommended security measures for Rushdie’s address, because they
thought they would “create a divide between the speakers and the audience,” as
two sources explained to CNN. Frankly, Chautauqua should probably reflect even further
on this incident and what it really means.
Fortunately,
jazz has healing powers, so it is frustrating Chautauqua at 150 often
has interview subjects talking over the music. However, the backstory of the
extended suite and its post-9/11 premiere deserve the time devoted to them. It
also speaks to longevity of the Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestras membership since
many musicians, including saxophonist Ted Nash and trumpeter Marcus Printup
were with the band back in 2001 (in fact, there were with J@LC well before
that). As a result, they obviously have seamless cohesion as a band and probably
intuitively understand what their leader Marsalis is looking for.
People forget, but no president was more supportive of immigration than Ronald
Reagan—legal immigration, that is. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich
and his wife Callista present portraits of notable American [legal] immigrants
very much in the Reaganesque tradition in Journey to America with Newt and
Callista Gingrich, which airs this Tuesday night on PBS.
It
might seem like a blindingly obvious point, but Prof. Susan Hanssen helpfully
points out legal immigration is good, because it allows those who follow the
law coming here can fully benefit from the rule of law as a recognized member of
society. Conversely, illegal immigration is bad for the same reason. Indeed,
all of the Gingrichs’ subjects came to America legally, duly taking citizenship
over time.
This
is quite a starry lineup, including Golden Age movie star Hedy Lamarr, whose contributions
as an inventor and scientist are also cogently explained. In fact, the Gingrichs
largely cover the same territory as Bombshell: The Hedy Lamarr Story,
but with greater economy. As you would expect from the Catholic Gingrichs,
their coverage of Saint Frances Xavier Cabrini, the first American citizen beautified
into Sainthood, is also quite strong. It also reminds potential visitors the
Cabrini Shrine in upper Manhattan is lovely often overlooked attraction.
Perhaps
the most controversial segment focuses on the late Henry Kissinger, reminding
viewers the future Secretary of State came to America with his Jewish family, as
penniless refugees from National Socialist Germany. It makes you wonder why the
hard left likes to smear Kissinger (a diplomat), who happens to be Jewish, as a
“war criminal,” instead of Robert McNamara, Dean Rusk, or William Rogers, but not
really.
Arthur Conan Doyle would probably hate this adaptation of his mummy short
story, for the same reason many of his fans will enjoy it. Departing from the
original text, it creates a role that is clearly implied to be you-know-who. Of
course, he could justifiably complain the annual BBC series, A Ghost Story
for Christmas had no business adapting his creepy yarn, because it is about
a mummy, not a ghost. Still, maybe screenwriter-director Mark Gatiss might
argue a mummy is an undead spirit that loiters malevolently, much like a ghost.
Regardless, there is plenty of gothic tweediness in Lot No. 249, which
airs tomorrow on Buffalo Public Television (airing a Ghost Story for
Christmas, more-or-less for Christmas, as it was originally intended).
Abercrombie
Smith is a very smart but not quite genius Oxford medical student, who treats Edward
Bellingham, the eccentric Egyptology scholar in the digs next-door for
exhaustion, nervous collapse, or really just some kind bizarre trance-like
state. Whatever you call it, viewers can tell he has been dabbling in black
arts.
Sure
enough, soon thereafter, Bellingham’s campus rival is throttled by a mysterious
hulking figure. For an Oxford student, Smith puts two and two together relatively
quickly, deducing Bellingham has found a way to reawaken and control the mummy
he bought at auction—that would be lot number 249. However, before confronting
Bellingham, he wishes to “consult” his unnamed friend, a detective hoping to
soon move to Bakers Street, who is decidedly not inclined to give credence to
the supernatural.
Indeed,
the Holmesian references are quite amusing. Gatiss also amps up the gay
subtext, which almost feels unnecessary for a story set in the rarified world
of elite British public (meaning private) school alumni. Frankly, Mummy makeup technology
really hasn’t needed to advance much since Boris Karloff bandaged-up in 1932,
so this one looks just as well as most of the ones that came before.
He was like the Orson Welles of the Renaissance. Everyone knew he was
brilliant, but he still had trouble finishing projects. Of course, he left
behind enough to judge his genius—like the Mona Lisa. He led an eventful life,
which is fortunate since he has already been the protagonist of fictional series
from Starz and CW. Now the true Renaissance man becomes Ken Burns’ first
non-American subject when the two-part Leonardo da Vinci (co-directed by
Sasha Burns and David McMahon) premieres this Monday and Tuesday on PBS.
Yes,
Leonardo was illegitimate, but the battery of historians and talking heads do a
nice job explaining why that really wasn’t such a big deal at the time.
Frankly, the same was true for his presumed sexuality in pre-Savonarola
Florence. There is still a good deal of speculation regarding Leonardo’s life,
particularly his early years, but the law firm-sounding trio of Burns, Burns,
and McMahon do a nice job of covering all the periods of his life, from Vinci
to Florence and then onto Milan and eventually France.
Logically,
they focus and good deal on his work, particularly his sketches, codices, and
scientific journals. Frankly, they make a convincing case Leonardo really was
hundreds of years ahead of his time, especially with regards to his deductions
regarding the structure and mechanics of the human heart.
Of
course, it is also frustrating to hear about all the commissions he left
incomplete or had canceled at the last minute. Arguably, they had to give “Vetruvian
Man” roughly equal time as the Mona Lisa and the Last Supper,
because that is what they had to work with.
In the mid to late 2000s, there were scores of documentaries about PTSD. Today, when
they are not so politically useful to the anti-war cause, there have almost completely
disappeared. Anthony Marquez noticed a similar phenomenon with Gold Star
families. They received an initial outpouring of support, but after a year or
so, people largely forgot them. That is why Marquez decided to personally
check-in with the families of all 17 fellow Marines of his unit who died in
Sangin, Afghanistan. Filmmaker Manny Marquez follows his brother’s cathartic journey
in Make Peace or Die: Honor the Fallen, which airs this Monday on PBS,
as part of the current season of Independent Lens.
Sangin
will be remembered as one of the deadliest destinations ever for the Marine
Corps. Not surprisingly, his experiences there haunted Marquez years after the
fact. As part of his self-proscribed therapy, he hand-crafted (or chainsaw-crafted)
memorial statues for each Gold Star family, which he hand-delivered. Realizing
how quickly the community support evaporates for Gold Star families, Marquez
resolved to revisit the same families one year later (this time with his brother
following him).
Most
were incredibly welcoming, even though his visits inevitably rekindled the pain
of their loss. He hardly knew some of their sons, but he could still relate
through their shared experiences. At times, he even questions his mission, but
eventually doubles down, inviting the families to a special commemoration ceremony
at Camp Pendleton. Along the way, he assembles a special dress uniform,
consisting of garments and medals contributed by the seventeen families.
There
are several deeply emotional moments in Make Peace or Die (the title
refers to Corps 1st Battalion, 5th Marines’ motto—as in
make peace with us, or else). However, the sequence that will absolutely destroy
viewers documents the final hours of Marquez’s military service dog, who even
had a Marine honor guard for the fateful last trip to the vet’s office. No
matter how tough you think you are, you are going to be choked up.
This
is a powerful film that should have had much more attention on the festival
circuit. Obviously, Marquez approached his subjects with the best of intentions.
After all, his parents appear in the documentary, as well as his brother. Of
course, nobody wants to question the motives of some the docs that came out so regularly
during the George W. Bush administration, but isn’t it so strange how they just
aren’t being produced anymore (with the exception of this film)?
The mezzotint print-making process might seem old-fashioned, but one of its
leading practitioners was M.C. Esher, whom M.R. James might have appreciated,
at least for his use of initials. Typically, mezzotints never change, but not
the one in this M.R. James short story. Understandably, that rather bedevils
its new custodian in Mark Gatiss’s The Mezzotint (part of the A Ghost
Story for Christmas annual series in the UK), which airs on participating PBS
stations.
Edward
Williams definitely stays true to his school. He curates the traditional
Ox-bridge-ish university’s decorative arts museum and spends most of personal
time at the U club with his old college mates. Each day is largely the same,
but that is how he likes it, until a mysterious mezzotint arrives for his appraisal.
Williams
had not thought much of it, but his golfing friend Binks sees more in it. In
fact, he describes a rather different picture, with a moon rising above the
country house and a shadowy figure just starting to enter the frame. Weirdly,
those elements had not been in the picture before, because, as Williams soon
deduces, it changes slightly every time he looks at it. That sounds crazy, but
Williams’s old school chums Garwood and Nisbet confirm it, much to their own
surprise. It confuses all the three alumni, but Williams also feels an uneasy suspicion
that the dark figure will do something horrible when he finally enters the
house.
Of
course, the mezzotint surely must represent events that occurred when it was
printed in the 1800s, right? Yet, to Williams, it feels like a tragedy slowly unfolding
before his eyes, especially when he learns he might have a personal connection
to its town of origin. That last bit is all Gatiss, but it is a nice macabre
little wrinkle. Regardless, it is strange no previous anthology series has
taken a shot adapting it, especially considering it requires no special effects—just
a quality print-maker.
In
fact, this is one of Gatiss’s best “Ghost Stories for Christmas,” or just plain
“Ghost Stories,” if you are watching on PBS. The mezzotint is a clever gimmick
and Gatiss maximizes its full Twilight Zone-ish potential.
Aubrey Judd is so old school, he largely built his reputation on radio. He
still hosts the same long-standing ghost story program, but, much to his
frustration, annoying hipsters now write most of the tales he reads. However,
the script gets flipped in more ways than one in Mark Gatiss’s The Dead Room,
which airs on participating PBS stations over the coming month.
Unlike
The Tractate Middoth, this week’s Ghost Story (formerly
“for Christmas”) is not based on a M.R. James classic. Here we have a Gatiss
original, but perhaps he should have stuck with the master.
Regardless,
hammy Judd is a perfect fit for the great Simon Callow. Frankly, Judd finds
tonight’s story a bit tacky, because of the violence, but his new producer,
Tara, believes it is the kind of contemporary work they need to spruce the show
up. Ironically, they must record this week’s production in the old, shabby studio
the show used to be produced in years ago.
Initially,
Judd finds it rather nostalgic to return to his old “haunt.” At least that is
what he tries to project for the benefit of Tara and Joan, their ancient,
taciturn foley artist. Yet, he soon hears strange noises nobody else notices.
Perhaps most ominously, the pages of his script in explicably re-arrange
themselves into a completely different story. It rather unnerves him, but
somehow he fails to recognize the significance of it all.
In
terms of story, Dead Room is passable, but it is no M.R. James yarn.
Clearly, Gatiss tries to bring “updated” contemporary social sensibilities to
the venerable Ghost Story for Christmas tradition, but it possibly
backfires. After all, Judd’s identity is central to his character and his actions,
but they consequently lead to the sins he must account for.
Nevertheless,
it is a pleasure to listen to Callow unleash his inner Vincent Price as he
waxes poetic over great ghost stories and other assorted pleasures of life. Callow
has the voice for it, so he ought to narrate more spooky tales for real.
Do not call them a “ghost band.” For years, they played with Tito Puente
and other great Latin bandleaders, so they are not about to stop now. They
still sound great and keep gigging with a regularity younger musicians would
envy. The reminiscences are almost as enjoyable as the music in Mari Keiko
Gonzalez’s Mambo Legends: The Music Never Ends, which airs tomorrow on
PBS, as part of the current season of Voces.
Led
by bandleader John “Dandy” Rodriguez, under the “music direction” of Jose
Madera, the Mambo Legends Orchestra is sort of like a Puente tribute band,
because his music dominates their set lists. They all played El Rey, but most
also had stints in the Machito and Tito Rodriguez bands, the other two of the
big three Latin bands.
They
are all accomplished and have plenty of stories to tell, like baritone
saxophonist Carmen Laboy, who was the first women to perform on-stage with Puente’s
band. We also hear from saxophonist Mitch Frohman, who happened to be a Jewish
kid from the Bronx, who discovered Latin jazz and dance music when he sat in
with Joe Cuba, while gigging with another band in the Catskills.
It
turns out, you probably heard a lot of Frohman’s work. Years ago, he recorded
multiple improvisations for episodes of Sex and the City. However, he has
yet to receive full and fair compensation. And just like that, another musician
gets a raw deal.
For many [stupid] people, books are sort of like ghosts. They relics from
the past, bearing witness to the folly we might have prevented, had we only
read more of them. However, a part-time librarian might have a legitimately haunted
book on his shelves, which is bizarrely in-demand throughout Mark Gatiss’s The
Tractate Middoth, based on the classic M.R. James story, which airs on
participating PBS stations over the coming month.
Although
originally produced by the BBC as part of their annual Ghost Story for
Christmas, PBS apparently believed the productions they licensed better fit
Halloween season. Neither is wrong per se, because James is timeless—and hopefully
so are books.
Intellectually
gifted but financially challenged William Garrett rather enjoys working
part-time in the library, while pursuing his advanced studies, even though “Sniffer”
Hodgson, the supervising librarian, is a pompous blowhard. At least he did,
until John Eldred requests the Tractate Middoth, an ancient Hebrew text.
The
first time Garrett tries to pull it, he believes a mysterious shrouded figure coincidentally
retrieved it before him. The next time Eldred calls to request it, Garrett
passes out on the way to its shelf, overcome by the supernatural pollen
suddenly swirling about. Clearly, that volume holds sinister secrets, involving
its former owner, the nasty Dr. Rant, who maybe orchestrated all this weirdness
while expiring on his deathbed, as we partially saw during the prologue.
Tractate
Middoth is
a particularly British ghost story. Indeed, it is easy to imagine how James’s
tale might have inspired some of the early library business in A Discovery of Witches. If the story sounds familiar, maybe it is because Leslie Nielsen
also portrayed the intrepid librarian on the early-1950s Lights Out anthology
show.
TV Prime Minister Robert Sutherland outlasted Boris Johnson Liz Truss, and
Rishi Sunak. He might be the most reassuring PM since Jim Hacker on Yes,
Prime Minister. However, Sutherland could use a Sir Humphrey, because many
of his cabinet members follow their own agendas, often against the interests of
his administration. It gets so bad, his flamboyantly arrogant Conservative
Party rival Archie Glover-Morgan is more friend than foe this time around—or at
least it’s a close call. That will be a problem when the next crisis strikes in
the 6-part COBRA: Rebellion (a.k.a. season three), which premieres
tonight on PBS.
To
embarrass her father, Sutherland’s daughter Ellie joined an extremist
environmental group occupying tunnels under a contested construction site.
However, she needs daddy to save her when a freak sink-hole collapse traps her
underground. The disaster site turns into a crime scene when remnants of an
explosive device are discovered. Awkwardly, the activist trapped with her knows
an awful lot about it. Logically, suspicion also falls on Ellie, requiring her
father to maintain impartial treatment towards her.
That
does not sit so well with his wife Rachel, with whom his marriage was already
strained. Fortunately, he can finally count on the wise counsel of his chief of
staff, Anna Marshall. Like Lloyd Bridges in Airplane!, she picked the
wrong day to return from sick leave, after waking from her second season coma. Indeed,
she wants to be in the cabinet briefings (the so-called COBRAs) to support
Sutherland—and anywhere else he might need her . . . support.
Somehow,
a fictional Middle East kingdom that is absolutely not supposed to represent
Saudi Arabia is also mixed up in the expanding crisis. Apparently, they
kidnapped the dissident Princess Yadira, who was a women’s rights activist back
home and a legal resident of the United Kingdom. Sutherland is quite put out
that they would conduct such an operation on British soil, but the ruthlessly
ambitious Defense Minister, Victoria Dalton is determined to preserve British defense
contractors’ lucrative deals with the oil-rich kingdom.
Uncharacteristically,
Glover-Morgan, who ascended to the deputy PM position in season two, advises
caution to both. While he wants to preserve the defense contracts, he also wants
no part of the regime’s reported human rights abuses. In fact, the subtle evolution
of Glover-Morgan, from jerky to rather waggish, is one of the best developments
in Rebellion.
David
Haig practically chortles with delight firing off zingers and scheming behind-the-scenes.
He is like Frank Underwood or Francis Urquhart in either version of House of
Cards, except Glover-Morgan is more human, more principled, and arguably a
true patriot, despite his devious, roguishness. Honestly, if he were the lead
of the next season, it would be jolly good fun.
In
comparison, Robert Carlyle is still a bit bland as Sutherland, but he projects
a sense of sound judgement and temperament that frankly a lot of Americans are currently
yearning for. Lisa Palfrey is still appropriately shifty and morally ambiguous
as Intelligence Chair Eleanor James. Edward Bennett is also entertainingly
snide and pompous as Glover-Morgan’s former ally, press secretary Peter Mott,
who has turned against the Deputy PM. However, Marsha Thomason is dull as dish
water playing former Sutherland advisor and current Labour shadow minister,
Francine Bridge, whose duties apparently solely consist of walking about
looking heroically concerned. Similarly, a lot of viewers would prefer to leave
Holly Cattle’s character, nauseatingly petulant Ellie Sutherland buried in the
collapsed tunnel.
Do you like dolphins? If so, you should despise Putin. Since the launch of
his illegal invasion, the Ukrainian wildlife reserve on the Black Sea has found
the corpses of at least 5,000 dolphins, but they estimate thousands more have
died. Clearly, animals have suffered from Russia’s military aggression, just
like the Ukrainian people. Yet, despite the chaos and danger, ordinary
Ukrainians have risked their lives to rescue animals both wild and domestic. Viewers
need to watch their brave efforts, which Anton Ptushkin documents in “Saving
the Animals of Ukraine,” premiering this Wednesday on PBS, as part of the
current season of Nature.
It
sure is funny how everyone who was so concerned about the animals in the
Baghdad Zoo have had so little to say about the animals of Ukraine. Regardless,
the entire world saw images of desperate Ukrainian refugees carrying their
beloved pet cats and dogs. As a result, at least one NGO talking head had to
dramatically rethink they way he thought about refugees. Inevitably, many pets
were still left behind, often not intentionally, but rather due to unexpected
Russian bombardments. Zoopatrol was organized to save those animals, either by
jail-breaking them outright, or noninvasively feeding them through front-door
peep-holes (this mostly works for cats).
Perhaps
their most famous rescue is Shafa, who was found by drones trapped on the
exposed ledge of a completely bombed-out seventh-floor apartment, where she had
been perched for sixty days, with minimal food or water. Despite her advanced
age, they successfully nursed Shafa back to health. Since then, she has become
an online sensation, symbolizing Ukrainian resilience in her own grumpy cat
way.
Likewise,
Patron the Jack Russell terrier has also become an international influencer,
thanks to his work sniffing out landmines. Patron’s small size gives him an
advantage over other ordinance-detecting dogs, because he is too light to
set-off mines calibrated for human weight. That little guy is a charmer.
Unfortunately,
many of the stories Ptushkin documents are profoundly sad, like the two animal
shelters that took very different approaches when evacuating their human
staffs. Tragically, both shelters were near Hostomel Airport, which Putin’s
thugs and mercenaries bombed into rubble, greatly distressing the animals in
the process. Clearly, several on-camera experts suggest one shelter handled the
challenge in a much more humane manner, but the real villain is Putin, who put
both shelters directly in harm’s way.