Monsters are like bad movies. Nobody intentionally sets out to make either one, but they happen anyway. In
this case, Vicaria’s intentions are good. She wants to resurrect her older
brother Chris, who was killed far too young. Of course, playing God always
turns out to be an act of dangerous hubris in films, as is indeed the case in
Bomani J. Story’s The Angry Black Girl and Her Monster, which opens
today in theaters.
According
to Vicaria, she isn’t just trying to bring Chris back to life. Her true
spiration is to cure death. If she could cure taxes too, that would be great. Obviously,
she is aware of Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, because she labeled her lab journal
“The Modern Prometheus.” Story also has seen a few Frankenstein films in his
time, judging from the crackling electricity that powers her experiments and a pivotal
line of third act dialogue that transparently echoes Bride of Frankenstein.
Heck, maybe Vicaria’s surname is even Frankenstein. It is coyly never revealed,
but we know it is unusual and sounds “German.”
Like
every Frankenstein Monster, the re-animated Chris turns out to be far more
violent and far less rational than Vicaria hoped. At least he has plenty of
potential victims in their economically depressed neighborhood. There are the
cops everybody hates and Kango’s drug gang, who prey on their human frailties.
Sadly, Vicaria’s father has been one of their regular customers, since her
mother was killed by a stray bullet.
In
terms of style and tone, Angry is somewhat akin Michael O’Shea’s The Transfiguration. Without question, Story emphasizes the socio-economic
circumstances of the characters, but it is not as didactic as you might fear.
True, Vicaria’s best friend Aisha is all-in for woke Columbus rants, but they
sound as counter-productive as Vicaria’s experiments turn out to be.
If ever there was an animal in need of a hero, it would be the pangolin.
Thanks to the black market in Mainland China (where their meat is considered a
delicacy and their scales are a staple of “Chinese medicine”), the scaly mammal
remains one of the world’s most endangered animals. These pangolins residing in
a subterranean Fraggle Rock-like fantasy world face an even graver
peril. However, young Peter Drawmer just might be the hero their prophecies
foretold in screenwriter-director Matt Drummond’s The Secret Kingdom,
which opens tomorrow in New York.
According
to the prologue fairy tale, the two worlds were once connected, but when the
young, brilliant king died, they were split apart. Drawmer always lived in our
world above, but when his family moved to his father’s drafty old ancestral
home in the countryside, the fantasy world below starts calling him. Then, that
night, a hole opens in his room, swallowing his bratty little sister Verity, so
he reluctantly dives in after her.
Down
below, the Pangolin oracle immediately hails Drawmer as the foretold king, but
the Pangolin general is skeptical. Regardless, if Drawmer is their savior, he
hasn’t come a minute too soon. The Pangolin soon find themselves under attack
from the forces of darkness. Peter and Verity get cut off from the rest of the
Pangolins, but they still have Pling, who is well-versed in the prophesies, as
well as epic songs that serve as the pangolins’ maps for navigating their
fantasy world.
The
pangolins and many of the other fantastical creatures are surprisingly
well-crafted. Secret Kingdom might be ripping off the Henson workshop’s
greatest hits, but it does so surprisingly well. The fantasy quest, involving
pieces of a puzzle Drawmer must assemble to restore the fantasy world’s
internal clock, is serviceable enough. The problem is both Drawmer siblings are
way too young (and way too passive) for a fantasy so transparently inspired by The
Dark Crystal and Labyrinth. They just aren’t right for the film.
Salvador Dali was a self-described “anarchist, monarchist Catholic.” That is
three strikes against him in today’s groupthinking world, but Mary Harron made
a film about him anyway. He was, after all, the most recognizable artist of his
time, or any other. Dali knew it too. His fame combined with his eccentricity
and constant financial shortfalls makes him decidedly difficult to work with in
Harron’s Daliland, which opens Friday in New York.
At
this late stage of Dali’s career, he can practically sell anything with his
signature on it, which is fortunate, because he and his wife Gala spend money
like water. Frankly, he and his manager, Captain Moore, might even be complicit
in flooding the market with dubious prints and lithographs. However,
fresh-faced (and fictional) James Linton has yet to be so disillusioned by the
art world (but it will come). Initially, he is thrilled when his gallerist boss
“lends” him to Dali to assist the preparations for his upcoming show, which
still includes painting eighty percent of it, or so.
Initially,
Gala Dali was also hoping Linton would “assist” her too, but he wriggles out of
those duties when she starts obsessively focusing on her latest “project,” Jeff
Fenholt, the Broadway star of Jesus Christ Superstar, who would
eventually become a musical televangelist. Ironically, Dali’s bemused pal Alice
Cooper, who eventually starred in the live TV production of Superstar, also
appears as a minor supporting character, reacting with a healthy degree of
skepticism to the artist’s more over-the-top provocations. Of course, Linton
thinks it is all quite charming, especially Ginesta, Dali’s waifish
model-entourage member, until things really get to be too much.
In
addition to the three strikes from Dali’s politics, Daliland carries a fourth
strike thanks to Ezra Miller, who appears in flashbacks as the young Dali. Yet,
ironically, the “troubled” thesp is arguably more convincing and compelling as
the younger Dali, especially when recreating the artist’s fits of spasms and
bouts of neuroses.
Admittedly,
Sir Ben Kingsley is highly entertaining to watch chewing the scenery as the
older incarnation of the artist-provocateur, but his performance is more about
embracing and accentuating Dali’s eccentricities than exploring his inner
psyche. Arguably, Miller is more successful at the latter, with far less
screen-time.
These superheroes are inspired by the Bronze Masks of Sanxingdui unearthed by archaeologists
in Sichuan back in the late 80’s, but they have been upgraded to gold. Apparently,
gold is more blingy and it presumably costs the same to animate. Charlie would
also prefer gold, because of its higher re-sale value. Few people consider him
a hero, least of all Charlie, but a hero-less mask chooses him anyway in Sean
Patrick O’Reilly’s Heroes of the Golden Mask, which releases this Friday
in VOD.
Li’s
father was the leader of the Golden Mask quintet of heroes, until he died in
battle against the evil super-villain Kunyi, who is determined to steal
Sanxingdui’s mystical Jade Blade. The archer and her team-mates, including a Chinese Zodiac-shape-shifter, a hammer-wielding fish-person from Atlantis, and a telekinetic
juggler, know Kunyi will be back, so Li must let her dad’s mask divine its next
host. Bizarrely, it picks crime-infested contemporary Chicago as the place to find
a new hero.
Charlie
is an orphaned pick-pocket, who lives by his fingers and wits. He is a thief,
but he is hardly the nastiest criminal in Chicago. Unfortunately, he owes money
to the far worse Rizzo, whose voice was supplied by the late Christopher Plummer.
When things get too hot for Charlie, Li provides a convenient escape, but he is
reluctant to embrace his new heroic role.
Golden
Mask holds
the distinction of being Plummer’s final screen credit. Frankly, his familiar
Transatlantic accent would seem like an odd choice for the Capone-like Rizzo, but
his growling whisper does not sound completely out of place. Without a doubt,
Ron Perlman’s voice is best cast as the sinister Kunyi, whereas Patton Oswalt
is the most annoying as Aesop, the whining Atlantean.
Asian detectives like Charlie Chan. Mr. Moto, and James Lee Wong were popular
in the 1930s, but they have become controversial in retrospect, because they
were portrayed by European actors (except Mr. Wong, played by Boris Karloff,
who was of Indian heritage). Edison Hark is a Honolulu cop like Chan, but he is
definitely cut from a different cloth, reflecting more contemporary
sensibilities. His latest investigation takes him to San Francisco, but it hits
really close to home for Hark in Pornsak Pichetshote’s graphic novel the
Good Asian, with art by Alexandre Tefenkgi and Lee Loughridge, which
releases today in a deluxe hardcover bind-up.
Hark
did not really want to come to San Francisco, but his wealthy white adopted father Mason
Carroway has fallen ill and may never recover. As a desperate final gesture,
Hark’s adoptive brother Frankie requested his help finding their father’s possible
lost love, Ivy Chen. She had a rather complicated history with the Carroway
family. In addition to her ambiguous relationship with their father, Frankie
might have also carried a torch for her too, but not Hark. He had a thing for
Frankie’s sister, Victoria. She was usually away at boarding schools and rarely
at home during their youth, so it wasn’t so weird—at least that is what they
told themselves.
Hark
deliberately references Chang Apana, the Honolulu cop who was the real-life
inspiration for Charlie Chan. However, the hardboiled family dynamics have more
of a Big Sleep vibe, with the search for Ivy Chen replacing that for
Sean Regan. Yet, the attitude towards just about all forms of American
authority in 1936 is more in keeping with Polanski’s Chinatown, but with
a far greater understanding of the real Chinatown.
Yes, Danny's father made a lot of mistakes, but at least he introduced his
son to a lot of great classic films and music. Nothing too explicit, of course.
To say Steve was an over-protective parent would be an understatement. Sadly, the
reasons for his behavior are understandable, but that does not make them any
less detrimental to Danny’s psychological development in writer-creator Pete
(not Peter the Hobbit guy) Jackson’s eight-part Somewhere Boy, which
premieres Wednesday on Hulu.
When
he was still infant, Danny’s mother was killed in a hit-and-run accident. The negligent
driver also killed a good part of Steve at the same time. Breaking ties with
his sister Sue, Steve raised Danny in an isolated country cottage, brainwashing
him to believe only dangerous monsters lived outside their house, since they
were mostly likely the last people on Earth left alive.
Steve
was definitely moody, but he tried be a loving father. Danny idolized him,
believing he kept them alive through his hunting and foraging. He also
enthusiastically adopted Steve’s tastes in films and music (including Hoagy
Carmichael). Naturally, his father’s suicide hit Danny hard. Fortunately, Steve
left word with Sue to come looking for Danny before he died.
Danny
breaks Sue’s heart, for multiple reasons, but it is hard to communicate with
the stunted and withdrawn teen. Her own teenaged son Aaron can hardly relate to
Danny and he resents having to share his room with his weird new cousin. The
more Danny hears about his dad, the more awkward Sue and Aaron feel around him,
but at least he develops a goal. He is determined to find the “monster” who
killed his mother and make him pay.
Although
there is some menace surrounding Danny’s hunt for the hit-and-run driver, Somewhere
Boy is even less of a thriller than Sean Penn’s vengeance-seeking character-study
The Crossing Guard. Jackson is much more concerned with Danny and his
prospects for meaningful healing. There is a lot of forgiveness in the series,
both for Steve and Sue’s family, who struggle with Danny. It is easy to see
why. Unfortunately, the scenes involving the guilty driver are a bit
anti-climactic and frankly disappointing. Yet, the honesty of the extremely
dysfunctional family drama largely outweighs such missteps.
Lewis
Gribben is terrific as the twitchy, anti-social Danny, precisely because his
performance is so tightly restrained and inwardly focused. Samuel Bottomley is
also quite remarkable portraying the sullen Aaron, who starts to come out of
his own emotional shell as he comes to understand how much damage life has done
to Danny.
You can say GDR socialism was unifying, because it brought together the
Catholic Church and punk rockers—against the oppressive Communist regime. In
1989, Margarethe’s lover, Heinrich, regularly played with his band in a
dissident Church. Tragically, she could rarely attend, because she was confined
to an East German mental hospital, for punitive rather than medical reasons. German-born
French animator Lucas Malbrun revisits the final dark days of the GDR regime in
the short film Magarethe 89, which premiered at Cannes’ Quizane des
Cineastes 2023 (a.k.a. Directors Fortnight) and currently screens for free on
Festivalscope’s consumer-facing site.
Even
in the prison-like psychiatric hospital, there are inmate-patients willing to
inform on their fellow prisoners. However, Margarethe is determined to be free,
at least in her mind, but hopefully also in physical bodily terms too. At least
Heinrich is at liberty to play with his band, but he too must attend weekly “check-ups,”
if that is what they really are. Regardless, since it is 1989, viewers will
know the regime’s days are numbered, but for some, the act of informing is a
hard habit to break.
It is sort of like Groundhog Day all over again, but George Addo’s
new colleagues are doing it deliberately, at least until they get things right.
That is their job at the super-secret agency known as Lazarus. Whenever the
civilized world faces an extinction level event, they rewind time back to the
last July 1st, so they can fix things. That causes a lot of
confusion for Addo when he starts to remember what was rewound in creator-writer
Joe Barton’s The Lazarus Project, which premieres tomorrow night on TNT.
At
first, Addo was just a modestly hip British app developer on the brink of big-time
financial success. He married his girlfriend Sarah Leigh, but as they settled
down to live happily ever after, a virulent plague started killing everyone on
the planet. Then Addo woke up and it was July 1st, as if the last
six months never happened.
Of
course, Addo tries to warn the world of what is coming, but everyone assumes he
is crazy—except the mysterious Archie. She tells him where to meet her if he
remembers the next time it happens, which indeed it does. It turns out most
Lazarus agents need to be dosed with their memory drug before they can recall
past time resets. However, Addo is one of the few “mutants” that have developed
the talent on their own. His new moody colleague Shiv Reddy is another.
Fortunately,
Lazarus developed a sufficient vaccine for Covid-20, or whatever it was.
(Anyone who was suspicious about how quickly the last Covid vaccine was
developed—here’s your answer.) The bad news is a particularly massive nuclear
bomb nicknamed “Big Boy” has been stolen. The worse news is the apparent
involvement of Dennis Rebrov, a former Lazarus agent who turned against the
agency. He is now determined to see the world burn, which sounds inexplicably
nihilistic, but he has his reasons.
In
fact, many of the character-establishing flashbacks are among the best scenes
in Lazarus Project. Barton (whose screenwriting credits include Ritual
and Encounter) has a knack for character-driven sf. He largely punts
when it comes to credible scientific explanations, but so be it. He more than
compensates for a lack of Doctor Who-worthy doublespeak with his one-darned-thing-after-another
plot twists. Plus, he and the producers deserve credit for an additional,
complicating villain they reveal in episode seven. Here’s a hint: they are
committing genocide in Xinjiang.
Barton
and series directors Marco Kreuzpaintner (episodes one to four), Laura Scrivano
(five and six), and Akaash Meeda (seven and eight) keep viewers hooked, while
radically shifting our responses to Addo. He is clearly the protagonist, but
the demarcation between heroes and villains in Lazarus Project is a
subtle and shifting line.
Forget Fast & Furious and Mission Impossible. The most reliable
international action franchise is Don Lee’s “Beast Cop,” Ma Seok-do. He is more
rock than The Rock, more diesel than Vin Diesel, and at least ten times the
size of Tom Cruise. When his fists connect, people go flying. That happens a
lot in Lee Sang-yong’s The Roundup: No Way Out, which opens today in New
York.
The
criminals of Seoul have nightmares of Ma, but his fellow cops often tease the
good-natured giant. Joo Sung-cheol does not get to do that. Ma can tell his
colleague is dirty, but he cannot prove it yet. Ma’s team started investigated
the negligent murder of a woman who overdosed on “Hiper,” a new designer drug,
which led to a Japanese Yakuza-controlled drug ring. The operation is secretly
under Joo’s control and it has been skimming pills for extracurricular sales.
Having
figured out their books do not balance, the Yakuza has sent Ricky the enforcer
to teach Joo and his gang a lesson. It is a really bad time for Ma to start
sniffing around, especially when his supply of pills goes missing. However, he profoundly
underestimates the humble Ma. Their resulting cat-and-mouse game is a bit Columbo-like,
but physically, it is much rougher.
The
great joy of these films is watching Don Lee (a.k.a. Ma Dong-seok) punch,
pile-drive, and power-slap his way to the truth. Lee has a big, “happy warrior”
screen persona that is even more entertaining than Schwarzenegger in his 1980’s
prime. The Ma-Beast Cop films are perfect vehicles for his size and chops.
According to reports, Padre Pio (a.k.a. St. Pio of Pietrelcina) exhibited the
stigmata, healed the sick, bi-located, and faced multiple investigations from the
Vatican that were intended to discredit him. However, none of those things are
in this film, because why would they interest Abel Ferrara? Instead, viewers
will witness many of the future saint’s long dark nights of the soul. If you
thought he was tortured and tormented before, wait till you see him get the
Abel Ferrara-treatment in Padre Pio, which opens tomorrow in New York.
WWI
has ended and the men of San Giovanni Rotondo are making their triumphant
homecoming—but not all of them. This is the first example of how capricious and
unfair fate can be to the villagers. After the armistice, the land-owners
expect life to return to normal, but socialist rabble-rousers are organizing to
defeat the elite’s hand-picked candidate for mayor. Where is Padre Pio in all
this? Back at the monastery, wrestling with the Devil and his personal demons.
Is
that disconnection Ferrara’s whole point? Is this a statement on the Church’s divorce
from average people’s struggle to survive. That is certainly a valid
interpretation, but it feels somewhat at odds with the genuine (if somewhat eccentric)
Catholic spirituality of his best religiously themed film, Mary.
Even
by Ferrara’s raggedy standards, Padre Pio is a rather disjointed film.
There are moments of brilliant cinema, such as opening scene of the soldiers’ homecoming.
You can see Ferrara’s operatic fervor in all the secular passion play
sequences. However, whenever Padre Pio rages against the darkness, you half
expect Shia Labeouf to start baring his bottom, like Harvey Keitel in Bad
Lieutenant. Evidently, Ferrara was struck by the coincidence Padre Pio
started experiencing the stigmata around the time of the San Giovanni Rotondo
massacre, but the connection he makes in his mind is not reflected on screen.
Ferrara
also picked a heck of a time to stop working with Willem Dafoe. Labeouf makes a
poor substitute, even though it was Dafoe who recommended him to Ferrara. There
are some nice performances in Padre Pio, especially Cristina Chiriac, as
a recent war widow who refuses to grieve, and Salvatore Ruocco as the veteran,
whose advances she spurns, because he works as a foreman for the town’s noble
family. However, Labeouf just cannot find the right key or pitch for Padre Pio,
which is a big problem, since the film is ostensibly about him.
In recognition of the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, I review Topic's CHIMERICA at THE EPOCH TIMES. Review up here.
There was a time when Broadway was the place for horror. It was a very
different Broadway, when the masses could find an afternoon’s entertainment for
the change in their pocket. It was also a very different horror, with plays
like John Willard’s The Cat and the Canary and Adam Hull Shirk’s The
Ape supplying a Scooby-Doo-style “rational” explanation (and a lot of
killers in animal costumes). Horror has returned to Broadway, but the sensibilities
are more contemporary and the terrors are much more explicit than those of the
1920s. Unfortunately, ticket prices also conform to 2020’s expectations. Frankly,
getting snowed-in with a creepy family in the isolated cabin is bad in any
genre, but the implications are especially fearful in Levi Holloway’s Grey
House, directed by Joe Mantello, which officially opened last night on Broadway.
Technically,
their car hit a deer, but it seems like an unseen force is mysteriously guiding
Max and Henry to cabin in the woods. It is bitter cold out and Henry’s
banged-up leg needs tending, but the modest home still feels sinister. Soon,
the couple learns it is the abode of four pre-teen-to-teenaged girls and a silent
young boy, who all have a rather strange relationship with Raleigh, their
presumptive mother.
It
is the 1970s, but all the girls behave like they stepped out of an earlier era.
However, Henry quickly takes to the family’s medicine of choice: mysteriously
glowing moonshine, each batch of which carries a man’s name. The couple is in
big trouble, which they sort of recognize, but they do not realize how bad things
are until the girls invite Max to play their sinister (and possibly lethal) games.
The
producers of Grey House can hyphenate its categories all the like, but
there is definitely horror in there. There is even a spot of gore, which would
be modest by Evil Dead standards, but is quite impressive for a live
stage drama. In fact, there are a lot of clever visual effects that might not
be prohibitively expensive or complex, but look really impressive from the
audience’s perspective. There are things that suddenly shine or appear and
disappear that create a potent atmosphere of mystery and dread. Frankly, some
of revelations is Grey House are more shocking than they would be in a
movie, because as a play, you are seeing it “live.”
The line "I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore” has become an easy
shorthand quote to suggest a character’s old assumptions about how the world
works have just been turned on their head. It is the sort of thing David Lynch’s
protagonists might say. Maybe they did. I honestly don’t remember if that
precise line was included in the super-cuts of Wizard of Oz allusions seen
throughout Alexandre O. Philippe’s latest cinematically-themed documentary.
However, it should be reasonably safe to conclude Lynch has seen the 1939
classic fantasy and it made some kind of impression on the auteur after watching
Lynch/Oz, which opens this Friday in New York.
Evidently,
film critic Amy Nicolson and genre filmmakers Rodney Ascher, John Waters, Karyn
Kusama, Justin Benson & Aaron Moorhead, and David Lowery having been thinking
about Oz as an important source of Lynch’s inspiration for some time, because
they each get one section of the film to draw their connections.
Frankly,
they all make a very compelling case—so much so that Lynch/Oz will have
most viewers completely convinced after the first part. However, there are five
more sections, which largely repeat the same points. After a while, all the Oz-like
motifs in Lynch’s oeuvre, such as the red shoes, mysterious curtains,
doppelgangers, and the porous boundaries between dreams and reality, become repetitive.
We get it. Lynch definitely alludes to Oz in many of his films. Case closed.
Indeed,
Lynch/Oz shares the prime fault of Philippe’s previous documentary, The Taking, in that all his participating commentators share the same opinions
and make the same arguments. There are no crazy outliers (as there were in
Ascher’s Room 237) or dissenting opinions (as in Mark Hartley’s Not Quite Hollywood). It is just the same talking points, repeated five times
over. Waters gives it more of a personal spin and Ascher takes a more macro
perspective on Oz’s overall influence on American cinema in general, but
there are no conflicts in the six analyses Philippe presents.
When it comes to amateur sleuths, Neve Kelly is unusually highly motivated,
especially for a Gen Z’er. The murder she is trying to solve is her own. Obviously,
she is at a bit of a disadvantage as a ghost, but there are a few people who
can see her. Regardless, there is a murderer out there, who does not want to be
caught in The Rising, Peter McTighe’s eight-episode British remake of the
Belgian series Hotel Beau Sejour, which premieres tonight on the CW.
It
is not initially shocking the Kelly did not make home the morning after her
final motor-cross race of season. When she wakes up in the lake, she is still
not aware of her death. Unfortunately, due to the booze at the party and the
trauma of the murder, she has no memory of what was done to her, or by whom. At
first, nobody seems to be able to see her, but soon she realizes her hard
boozing father can. Of course, he cannot believe his eyes, but with a little
effort, she convinces him of her presence. Then she also realizes Alex Wyatt,
her boyfriend’s cousin can see her too. Eventually, it will get to the point
where it would be easier to just list who can’t see Kelly, but frustratingly
for her, her grieving mother Maria Kelly never can.
Weirdly,
the issue of who can see Kelly and why gets worked out to an acceptable extent.
However, there are a lot of other questions about the mechanics of “death” that
are never satisfactorily explained. Kelly still needs to take her motorbike to
get across town, but nobody can see her driving it, except her well-lubricated
dad. When she smashes up a vase, but it appears just as it was, once the living
turn their gaze towards it. Frankly, the way dead Kelly interacts with the physical
world makes almost no sense. Instead, it seems deliberately fluid, simply to
help advance the storyline. Yet, the persistence of those nagging issues of
logic constantly distracts from the drama.
There
is a lot in The Rising that comes perilously close to genuine silliness.
Still, the series has its creepy moments, especially when Kelly links her
murder to the previous disappearance of woman, whose body was never recovered. Matthew
McNulty and Emily Taaffe are also both excellent as Kelly’s divorced parents,
who deal with their grief in very different ways. Alex Lanipekun is also a
standout (in a good way) as Kelly’s distraught stepfather, Daniel Sands, whose own
grief is unfairly ignored and belittled by his overwrought wife.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt should be studied for one thing above all: how to serve
as commander-in-chief during wartimes. Throughout WWII, Roosevelt maintained a
long-term strategic perspective. Today, if over 7,000 American service
personnel were killed in a single battle, the press would probably call for the
President to be impeached, but that is exactly what happened at Guadalcanal,
relatively early in the war. Director Malcolm Venville and producer-chief
talking head Doris Kearns Goodwin again use her book Leadership in Turbulent
Times as a road-map for the three-part FDR, which starts tomorrow
night on History Channel.
As
in the previous Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt, Venville incorporates
dramatic interludes to illustrate episodes from Roosevelt life under discussion.
In this case, the casting of Christian McKay (who was terrific playing Orson
Welles in Richard Linklater’s Me and Orson Welles) is the best of the
History Channel hybrid docs, since Graham Sibley played Lincoln. With the help
of some makeup, McKay convincingly portrays the young and dashing Roosevelt up
through his tragic Yalta decline.
Kearns
and her colleagues’ commentary on FDR’s early years is somewhat revealing. It
probably is not well known how deliberately FDR patterned his political career
on that of his fifth-cousin, Teddy Roosevelt (jumping from the state
legislature, to assistant secretary of the Navy, and then to the governorship).
In fact, Eleanor Roosevelt was more closely related to TR, since she was his
niece. Kearns and company largely admire FDR’s politically astute tight-rope
walking, when he served as a prominent surrogate for Woodrow Wilson’s presidential
campaign, against TR. However, they never hold him to account for supporting Wilson,
who did more than any other president to institutionalize racial segregation.
Unlike,
Teddy Roosevelt, which includes ample criticism of TR, FDR features
nothing but praise for its subject (except for maybe a few minutes on the
Japanese-American internment). The lack of diverse perspectives is glaringly
obvious during talk of the New Deal. Frankly, many of FDR’s policies prolonged
rather than fixed the Great Depression. The timeliness of FDR’s court-packing
debacle is also lost on the collected historians.
Yet,
in terms of political biases, the worst over all three episodes is the
selective editing that makes Wendell Wilkie, the 1940 GOP presidential
candidate, look like an isolationist, when he was probably even more of an
internationalist than FDR, at that time. Seriously, Goodwin should be embarrassed.
They went from being stoner draft-dodgers to running sweatshops in Southeast
Asia, allegedly. Presumably, this Australian import series does not get that
far. As a highly fictionalized, twentynothing soap opera riff on the early days
of the Billabong and Quicksilver surf fashion rivalry, it will encourage most
viewers to wear Ocean Pacific instead. Creators Michael Lawrence, John Molloy,
and Liz Doran take us back to the birth of board shorts in Barons, which
premieres Monday on the CW.
Snapper
Webster built his surfing goods line off the proceeds of his mates’ annual surfing
expedition to Bali, if you know what I mean. He is tightly controlling of the
business, yet perversely averse to risk and change. That frustrates his best
mate Bill “Trotter” Dwyer, who is brimming with new ideas.
Inevitably,
he sets out on his own, with the help of his newlywed wife Tracy, who is
awkwardly Webster’s ex. To compile the insults, they launch their company with
seed money Tracy borrowed from Webster, ostensibly for her wedding. Webster
takes it badly, launching a very public feud. Meanwhile, several of their
mutual friends are sweating out the draft. The vociferously anti-war Dani Kirk
has even offered herself for sham marriages, even while she questions her own sexual
identity, especially after meeting acclaimed surfing photographer Shirley
Kwong.
Barons
would
have been much more watchable if it had more Endless Summer and less Hair.
Honestly, its New Left anti-war politics look overly simplistic and self-serving,
especially when considering the subsequent plight of the Vietnamese Boat People
and the oppressive corruption of the current Communist regime.
Unfortunately,
the subplots focusing on deserters and questioning draftees detract from what
could have been a deliciously ironic depiction of the peace-and-lover surfers
growing into cutthroat capitalists, at least judging from the first two
episodes, “Paradise Lost” and “Gone Surfing.” Instead of embracing the
characters’ inner Gordon Gekkos, Doran and co-writers Matt Cameron and Marieke
Hardy basically give us a shallow “Dawson’s Wave.”
Father-son relationships are often complicated. A foreign occupation will not make it any
easier for Jurgis Pliauga and his adopted son Unte. The young man is drawn to
the more proactive means of resistance advocated by Deacon, a leader of the
Forest Brothers partisans, whom he starts to see as a competing father figure. In
contrast, his father prefers to play dumb, drag his feet, and even hide, if
necessary, when the new occupying authorities come calling. Of course, tragedy
comes for all men of good conscience in Sharunas Bartas’s In the Dusk,
which premieres today on Film Movement Plus.
The
War is over, but the Lithuanians would hardly know it. From their perspective,
Soviet uniforms have simply replaced those of the Germans. Supposedly, they are
now part of the Soviet Union, but the reparations and protection money the
Soviets extort from them clearly imply their lowly position in the Soviet
hierarchy. As the owner of a sizeable farm, Pliauga is a prime target for their
shake-downs and his lazy farmhand Ignas also expects to receive part of his
employer’s land holdings, through the promised socialist distribution.
Both
Pliauga and Unte have social and commercial dealings with the rag-tag band of
partisans in the forest. Increasingly, Unte is swayed by Deacon’s greater
intellectual understanding of communism, democracy, and the Cold War, as well
as his willingness to fight for Lithuania’s freedom. However, Pilauga is
instinctively cautious. When the local troops come looking for him, the old man
hides in a secret room hidden in his barn, which obviously evokes memories of
those who hid from the Germans in a similar fashion.
In
the Dusk is
definitely an intentionally slow and deliberate film, but it is more accessible
than Bartas’s previous film Frost. Through the former, we witness the
long, slow death of innocence, experienced by Unte and anyone else who might have
hooped for a better life under the Soviets. The Forest Brothers are often rude
and crude, but they are not wrong about the Soviets.
Neither
is Pilauga. Watching the tragedy unfold, it is clear the partisans and the
farmers needed a more widespread, more coordinated, and more flexible campaign
of resistance. Of course, nobody looks worse than the Soviets, who are sadistic
torturers. Yet, they clearly do not believe their purported ideology either.
They just cynically mouth the right platitudes, while practically rolling their
eyes.
Inevitably,
it all ends in heartbreak, unless you are Putin or one of his Western amen
chorus, like Chomsky or MTG. This is a brutally realistic film that is rooted
in the muddy muckiness of the forests and farms. Cinematographer Eitvydas
Doskus makes it all look appropriately dark and ominous. Yet, Bartas still gets
some terrific performances from his cast, particularly Arvydas Dapsys, as the
cagey but sadly dignified Pilauga.
Maybe Ruja's famous artist father Pakorn used lead-based paint. For some
reason, his most notorious paintings seem to kill their owners. Technically,
they are hers now, but she cannot wait to sell them, for several reasons. Her
daughter Rachel urgently needs eye surgery, but she is also just plain uncomfortable
having them around. She has just cause to be uneasy in Surapong Ploensang’s Cracked,
which releases tomorrow on VOD.
Even
after her husband’s death, Ruja wanted nothing to do with her father.
Collectors might think he was a genius, but she knows he was a sadistic jerk. She
can’t remember all the details, but she knows he was bad. Nevertheless, she needs
the inheritance when his dealer, Wichai, informs her of Pakorn’s death.
Rather
ominously, a related pair of late career masterworks were returned to the
estate after the owner’s family-annihilation-suicide. Ruja won’t even let
Rachel in her dad’s studio, even before she sees the sexually suggestive portraits
of his late model, Prang. To maximize the re-sale value, Wichai’s son, Tim
restores the cracking areas. As he fiddles with the canvas, he finds evidence
of hidden portraits underneath Prang, which intrigue him considerably more than
Ruja. Intuitively, she suspects the paints are related to the supernatural
forces that have been harassing her and Rachel.
Cracked
(as
in chipping paint) is a lot like many other Thai and Southeast Asian horror
films, but Ploensang’s execution is super-effective. The film oozes atmosphere,
thanks in large measure to some terrific art and scenery design. The creepy old
manor is a perfect horror movie setting and the pair of paintings look like
they radiate pure evil.
This Australian cult has its members undergo recorded confessions, or
so-called “clearings,” which provide them ample blackmail fodder, should anyone
ever step out of line. Gee, can you imagine any purported cults with ties to
Hollywood engaging in similar practices? Yet, for Australian audiences, the
cult matriarch’s “children,” amassed through questionable adoptions and foster
arrangements, would immediately recall “The Family,” led by Anne
Hamilton-Byrnes. In the case of Adrienne Beaufort’s cult, things start to fall
apart when an over-zealous member kidnaps a little girl, who refuses to be
indoctrinated into the “family.” The mystery of young Sara’s fate will haunt
every character in writer-creators Matt Cameron & Elise McCredie’s The
Clearing, which premieres today on Hulu.
Sometime
in the past, Freya (as she now calls herself) was traumatically associated with
the cult based at Bronte-esque Blackmarsh Manor. She got out, but the scars
remain, especially when news of a child abduction triggers (the word is actually
appropriate in this case) bad memories.
Tamsin
Latham is a true believer, unwaveringly devoted to Beaufort, but her initiative
has been disastrous. No matter how hard they try to brainwash Sara, she refuses
to accept her new name, “Asha,” or her new “mother.” Beaufort’s favorite “child,”
possibly her own biological daughter, Amy, was supposed to win Sara/Asha over.
Instead, the little girl’s deep sense of self raises questions in Amy, at the
worst possible time—right before her first ritual “clearing.”
Cameron
and McCredie play a lot of devious games with the timeline that might be easier
to guess from this review than from watching The Clearing from the
start, despite my good faith efforts to be vague and misdirecting. However,
they are not simply being clever for the sake of cleverness. By the time you
get through the first four episodes provided for review (out of eight), you get
a potent sense of how the sins of the past continue to exert an evil influence
over everyone in the present, especially since several characters cut their own
deals, rather than holding fast to their principles.
Without
question, Miranda Otto is the star of Clearing as the chillingly regal
Beaufort. She makes the cult leader’s Svengali-like control over people totally
believable and absolutely terrifying. Likewise, Kate Mulvany might be even
scarier as the sadistic Latham, who seems to have joined the cult for the
opportunity to bully children. Guy Pearce is also pretty creepy and clammy as Beaufort’s
consigliere and theoretician, Dr. Bryce Latham, but it is still not clear why
the role was meaty enough to attract the well-known thesp.
This isn't just a series finale. It is a universe finale, marking the end of
the interconnected Arrowverse shows on CW. Either Superman & Lois
or Gotham Knights might still eke out a renewal, but they are both
set in different DC universes. Logically, a lot of familiar faces come back for
the “final run,” which is fortunate, since Barry Allen will need plenty of help
saving the current timeline in “A New World, Part Four,” the final episode of The
Flash, airing tonight on the CW.
Obviously,
a lot has happened since “It’s My Party and I’ll Die If I Want to,” much of it
involving time and speed. It seems a lot of the Flash’s old nemeses, living and
dead, have been brought together, to combine their powers and harness the speed
equivalent of The Force to defeat Team Flash. It would be deemed a spoiler to
name names, but if you have only watched a few cherry-picked episodes this
season, they might not be immediately recognizable. Regardless, they are all
speedy.
Meanwhile,
Iris West-Allen is in the hospital poised to deliver Baby Nora. The
long-awaited arrival of babies is a staple of series finales. Frankly, “New
World, Part Four” includes pretty much each and every one you could think of,
except the Seinfeld-style clip-package trial. Honestly, The Flash’s finale
is more satisfying, for exactly that reason.