Thanks to Mystery Science Theater 3,000, thousands of viewers gained a
weird new appreciation of educational films, from their riffing on Jam Handy
shorts. However, when it comes to traffic safety films, Jam Handy’s clean-cut dabbling
compare to the films produced by the Highway Safety Foundation as Ed Wood’s
corny Bela Lugosi movies do to the explicit Saw and Hostel franchises
in the horror genre. Yet, despite the Foundation’s gorier approach, their cautionary
films were widely screened in classrooms. Decades later, some former viewers
still claim they were traumatized by what they saw, while others collect their
films out of eccentric nostalgia. Filmmaker Bret Wood chronicles the non-profit
and their blood-splattered output in Hell’s Highway: The True Story of
Highway Safety Films, which screens this Wednesday night in theaters across
the nation, freshly restored in 2K.
Richard
Wayman was the brains behind the Foundation, working closely with Phyllis
Vaughn. In fact, the Foundation was headquartered in her house. They usually
contracted the production to others, including Mansfield Ohio reporter John R.
Domer, who often moonlighted shooting video at the grisly auto accidents that
he covered for his official outlet.
Even at
the time, the Foundation gained a reputation for the disturbing video and audio
they incorporated into their films. However, a whole lot of drivers ed teachers
clearly approved, assuming they would have a “scared straight” impact. Ironically,
their productions outside their core genre eventually led to trouble.
Apparently, their film exposing “sexual predators” in a Mansfield public men’s
room (the nature of which you can probably guess) led to rumors the Foundation
was secretly producing adult films. There was also a disastrous telethon hosted
by Sammy Davis Jr.
This is
a pretty crazy story that features several unlikely cameos. For instance, Sonny
Bono hosted their anti-marijuana film. Also, John P. Butler, the former Mansfield
police chief, who became a Foundation VP, recalls the meeting he booked with
Jimmy Hoffa to pitch their long-haul trucking safety film, Carrier Killer.
Of
course, a film like this has to be driven by the visuals that made the
Foundation’s reputation. Viewers should be either assured or forewarned that
there are an awful lot bloody and mangled bodies in Hell’s Highway. Wood
is never coy with regards to the subject matter and he certainly can’t be
accused of over-promising and under-delivering. There is more than enough to
judge the Foundation’s films, ethically and psychologically.
Recently, the State Department forced the Mamdani administration to cancel a
planned meeting with Iran’s UN ambassador. Although the Mayor disavowed any
prior knowledge, the City Journal reported the commissioner responsible
was acting on a directive to reach out to national government’s “in political
alignment/leftist.” A reasonable person might wonder why the mayor would consider
himself to be “in alignment” with the oppressive Revolutionary Islamic regime.
The dissident Iranians appearing in this film would also wonder. They were part
of the “Women. Life. Freedom” movement that launched in protest of Mahsa Jina
Amini, but morphed into a full-scale revolt against the mandatory Chador. At
the time of its UK premiere in 2023, Gesbeen Mohammad’s Inside Iran: The
Figjht for Freedom was one of the few documentaries independently chronicling
the protests from within Iran. It remains required viewing when it premieres
today on Tubi.
Mohammad
starts with a damning examination of Amini’s death, while in the custody of the
morals police, following a widely witnessed (but officially denied) beating of
customary viciousness. Her murder hit home hard for Rozhina, who shared many
mutual friends with Amini in their Kurdish Iranian town, Saqqez. Indeed, the “Women.
Life. Freedom” protests essentially launched during Amini’s funeral.
Mindful
of precedent, the regime often added insult to injury by blockading and
harassing the services for the protesters they murdered, like Fatemeh’s brother
Javad. Like Rozhina, she also eventually found sanctuary abroad. The censorship
their fellow Iranians face is not merely politically and artistically stifling.
Its net effect is the complete erasure of the fallen loved ones. That is why
activists like Mina and Hafez (seen only in shadows or in disguise) remained in
Iran to secretly record demonstrations and the oral testimony of victims.
Those
stories are often shocking and devastating. Frankly, our “mayor” should hear Maryam
explain how the so-called “morals” police sexually assaulted her with what she
assumed was a baton. When eventually released, she made an emergency trip to
her GYN specialist, who confided they were currently treating dozens of such
injuries.
They were like the Richard Nixon of pop acts. When they went to China, it was a bold
career. In fact, the notoriety launched the American publicity campaign for George
Michael and Andrew Ridgeley, the British duo billed as Wham! It was an expensive
and hectic tour, but it accomplished it objective, breaking the band into the
American market. Footage shot for the little-seen documentary covering their
historic gigs have now been restored and repurposed into Mike Christie’s Wham!
10 Days in China, which releases tomorrow in theaters.
The
group’s former manager makes it clear right from the start their Chinese
concerts were all about the American publicity. It is important to understand
how different China was in 1985. The notoriously closed nation was starting to
open up. Glasnost had been proclaimed in the USSR one month prior. Optimism was
breaking out internationally and would steadily build until the Tiananmen Square
Massacre in 1989. Wham! performing in China was seen as a sign of the changing
(for the better) times.
Michael
and Ridgeley got the concept of using China as an international fame slingshot,
but they did not enjoy it, judging from the tour footage. It probably did not
help that they chose the wrong director to helm the behind-the-scenes
documentary. “Angry Young Man” filmmaker Lindsay Anderson (who directed If… and
O Lucky Man) broke his leg soon after arriving in China and took an even
quicker disliking to the Wham! lads.
You can
also see early tension within the duo when Michael bails on press events,
leaving Ridgeley (who had far more contentious relations with the press at that
stage of their careers) holding the bag. However, the 1985 Ridgeley seems to
show genuine interest in the young Chinese fans who were only just discovering
Western pop through special distributions of their current album (mostly on
cassette, even though players were then scarce in the Peoples Republic).
For
obvious reasons, only Ridgeley was available to add his recent commentary.
However, he comes across quite graciously. Perhaps even more intriguing are the
segments featuring young Chinese fans, who were inspired to pursue careers in
popular music.
In
fact, listening to them makes it blindingly obvious that Christie refused to
connect some rather important dots. By and large, the majority of patrons for
the Wham! concerts were roughly high school aged. That would put them in college
when University students took the lead protesting Chinese Communist Party corruption
and oppression during the 1989 Tiananmen Square Demonstrations. This age group essentially
became China’s lost generation, when they were either killed or forced into
exile as a result of the Party’s crackdown. Consequently, it seems reasonable to
assume that in addition to future Chinese pop stars, many of those who attended
the 1985 shows are now dead or permanently cut off from their families and
homes.
They were part of an unlicensed pirate radio station that was shutdown by William
Kennard, Clinton’s FCC chief, so you’d think they would be more skeptical of
government regulation. Instead, they only whine about corporations. Frankly,
they were maybe ahead of their time, because the freeform format of KBLT in LA’s
Silver Lake neighborhood sounds quite aesthetically compatible with Spotify and
boutique satellite radio. The media landscape changed drastically, but KBLT
listeners and alumni still recall the station’s short tenure with fondness in director-producer-subject
Sue Carpenter’s documentary, 40 Watts from Nowhere, which opens tomorrow
in New York.
Today,
it is a lot easier to start a podcast than it was to launch a pirate radio
station in the 1990s, because of all the gear it required. Nevertheless, Carpenter,
a former office drone, jury-rigged her own neighborhood-focused pirate radio
station, which she operated out of her personal apartment. Initially based in the
Bay Area, she relocated to Silver Lake, where the rising hipster alternative
music scene quickly embraced KBLT.
It wasn’t
just proto-punk. KBLT also programmed jazz, blues, traditional country, 1960s
French pop, and eccentric spoken word selections. Musically, KBLT was more
inclusive than the current and recently demised network nightly talk shows. In
terms of content, they weren’t that much different from New York’s [only slightly]
more established WFMU.
Predictably,
there is much complaining about corporate this and that. However, Carpenter’s experiences
managing KBLT (while using her Paige Jarrett pseudonym) directly contradict the
film’s obvious ideology. Time and again, the DJs and their guests constantly
ate her food, drank her beer, and pilfered CDs from the station’s library.
Edgar Rice Burroughs’ novel The Land that Time Forgot featured British and
German sailors during WWI. The latest adaptation from The Asylum features
modern-day Australians and Russians. That is more than close enough for scrapy,
intentionally unpretentious B-movie studio. Calling their movies B-level might
be generous. They regularly churn out cheesy rip-offs of big budget releases
and dubious adaptations of public domain books, while their greatest hits were
the Sharknado movies. For some reason, they wanted their second take on
the aforementioned Burroughs novel to be their first Australian production. The
film will also be Australian Anthony Frith’s first full-length directing gig. Essentially,
they hired him because he was crazy enough to ask. However, he has no idea what
he is getting into, as he shows us, warts and all, in his own documentary, Mockbuster,
which releases in theaters and on digital this Friday.
Basically,
The Asylum trolls for viewers who either mistake their knock-offs (like The
Transmorphers) for the real thing or figure they look so stupid they must
be funny. They contain formulaic elements, most importantly including one
recognizable name in the cast. Why they wanted to make The Land Time Forgot again
is never really clear, but they did and they received Frith’s resume at an
opportune time.
Frith made
some short films as a student, but all of his work since then were commercial
training films. He is more surprised than anyone when they offer him a film, but
it soon becomes clear his producer has all the real power and his creative
input is strictly discouraged. Frankly, Frith can’t get too creative, even if
he wanted to, because he won’t get the script until a few days before shooting
starts.
Along
the way, he gets some sage advice from Eric Roberts, a veteran of many Asylum
productions. He mostly tells Frith to have fun with it, which seems to be his
approach to the interview and his own Asylum work. As a bonus, Frith appears as
an extra with Michael Pare, who is like the King of the Asylum lot, if they
were big enough to have a lot.
Of
course, the shoot is chaotic and The Asylum is far more controlling than you
might expect. Nevertheless, Frith must complete it in six days. It’s almost
like watching the Little Rascals trying to put on a show.
It is a shame Dr. Thomas Noguchi was no longer LA County’s Chief Medical
Examiner-Coroner during the O.J. Simpson murder investigation, because probably
no other pathologist had as much experience dealing with journalists and celebrities.
In fact, he was a familiar media presence before such transparency was
considered necessary. Unfortunately, many in Hollywood did not appreciate his
candor. Now in his 99th year, Noguchi looks back on his life,
career, and controversies in Ben Hethcoat & Keita Ideno’s documentary, Coroner
to the Stars, which opens Tuesday in Los Angeles.
Dr.
Noguchi was born in Japan, but emigrated to America to serve his residency in
LA. However, he truly found opportunity
in the LA Medical Examiner’s office. That would be LA County, rather than the city.
Regardless, Noguchi’s expertise and experience, including performing the autopsy
on Marilyn Monroe, convinced the Board of Supervisors to appoint him the Chief of
the office.
Noguchi
rose to unprecedented fame by conducting the autopsies of Sharon Tate, Robert
F. Kennedy Sr., William Holden, Natalie Wood, and John Belushi—and talking
about them after the fact. In fact, various talking heads suggest he initially better
understood ritual cult nature of the Manson Family murders than the police, who
started with the dubious assumption that the Tate and Lo Bianco massacres were drug
trafficking-related.
Without
question, Noguchi helped investigate some of the most notorious cases of his
era. Yet, weirdly, the doc overlooks the death of actor-politician Albert
Dekker, even though the circumstances of his demise were somewhat provocative.
Regardless, Noguchi autopsied plenty of celebrities, earning the ire of
Hollywood powerbrokers for openly discussing subjects like blood alcohol levels
and other potentially embarrassing information. Of course, when Hollywood had
trouble with Noguchi, that meant the Board of Supervisors had trouble with
Noguchi.
In retrospect,
it seems ironic that Noguchi took such heat, given the proliferation of
so-called “celebrity autopsy” shows now available from true crime programmers. Noguchi
was simply ahead of his time. Regardless, Hethcoat & Ideno are just dishy
enough to satisfy the core audience for a true crime-related film, while still clinging
to the political and sociological high ground.
Today, boxing has two competing heavy weight champions, holding various different
belts, but a lot of sports fans couldn’t name either of them. In contrast, in
the 1930s, nobody followed basketball or soccer, but everyone knew who was heavy
weight champ. Consequently, it meant something whether that pugilist paragon
was American or German. The so-called “Rumble in the Jungle” was certainly a
huge media event in 1974, but the Louis-Schmeling rematch was truly the fight
of the century, which boxing historians and (Louis) Barrow family members remember
and explain throughout The Clash of Nations: Joe Louis vs. Max Schmeling,
directed by Nikki Spetseris, which premieres this Friday on History Channel.
Even
adjusted for inflation, professional athletes never scored million-dollar
contracts in the 1930s. However, a son of share-cropping former slaves like Joe
Louis Barrow quickly discovered he could make good money in the ring once his
family moved north. It was not easy for black fighter to move up the rankings during
the post-Jack Johnson era, but not impossible. Indeed, Louis quickly became a
leading contender.
Fittingly,
Spetseris and company devote a good deal of time to the fight that cemented
Louis’s reputation and offered a preview of the Louis-Schmeling match-ups. The
American fighter faced Primo Carnera, who served as Mussolini’s proxy champion
in much the same way Schmeling would (perhaps somewhat reluctantly) for Hitler.
Black Americans already identified with Louis, but they also resented Italian military
adventurism in Ethiopia, during the months leading up to the full-scale invasion.
Consequently, the Louis-Carnera fight aroused great passions.
Likewise,
non-religious Jewish champion Max Baer made no secret of what he thought of
National Socialist Germany during his victory over Schmeling—another historically
significant bu largely forgotten bout also covered during the History program. On
the other hand, Louis’s first fight against Schmeling is well-documented, because
it did not go as he hoped, but it set-up a rematch of Rocky IV dimensions.
Every
boxing fan agrees Louis deserved better. After representing the free world in
the ring against Schmeling and serving in uniform during WWII, he was hounded
into bankruptcy by the shameful IRS. (If ever there was an agency to abolish,
that would be it.) As you would expect, Spetseris and company duly decry Southern
segregation, which was initially facilitated by Woodrow Wilson—perhaps one reason
why Louis often supported Republicans—a fact Clash of Nations ignores.
Ironically, in a few years, this documentary will probably be pirated on bit-torrent
sites, just like any other movie. Yet, it vividly illustrates the damage piracy
does to creative everyday people, who work for a living. In this case, it is illusion
designers and magic book authors whose livelihoods were jeopardized by a large
predatory magic piracy site. With help from the international magic community,
creator and performer Andi Gladwin hoped to pull off the biggest trick of his
career: making the piracy site disappear. Matthew Testa follows his
investigation in the documentary Stealing Magic, which screens again
this afternoon as part of the 2026 Tribeca Film Festival.
Like
film, books, and music, magic design has largely shifted to digital downloads.
Of course, that made Gladwin’s business much more vulnerable to piracy. He and
his partner, Joshua Jay invent and market new illusions, which magicians buy
and adapt for their acts. For obvious reasons, their products carry high prices,
while turning much lower volume as compared to standard trade publishing
releases, so piracy really cuts into their revenue and profitability.
One pirate
site in particular always seemed to have every designer’s latest releases. In a
particularly heart-breaking example, this site crushed the market for the late
Leo Behnke’s Taylor-Made Magic: The Life of Merv Taylor, a labor-of-love
study of the pioneering celebrity magician, which deserved its $100 price-point.
As more
and more colleagues quit in frustration, Gladwin decided to track down his
prime suspect, based on suspicious emails he had received. Initially, the trail
led to Serbia, but the man in question was most likely just a supplier.
Eventually, they use GPS trackers, following a shipment they believe the pirate
site ordered through proxies, all across Europe and eventually to Egypt.
This
really is an incredible story that will challenge many viewers’ preconceptions.
It directly contradicts the notion that piracy is a “victimless” crime.
Instead, it shows the financial and emotional pain piracy caused within the
magic community. These are creative people, but they or neither wealthy or privileged.
Remember this film if extremist provocateur Hasan Piker endorses a candidate in
your state. In addition to spewing antisemitism, Piker also declared: “I’m pro-piracy
all the way.”
Nothing destroys culture as quickly and as thoroughly as Communism. For instance,
only thirty films survived the Marxist Khmer Rouge’s reign of terror. Cambodian
pop received similar treatment from the Communist regime, but, even though most
of the musicians were killed, somewhat more music survives, thanks record collections
in other Southeast Asian nations. While the regime in Vietnam did not censor
non-socialist pop culture with the same vehemence, it did not make life easy
for its former stars, like Khoa Ha’s grandfather Y Van, who spent a short time
in a re-education camp. Several of his family members endured considerably
longer sentences. Consequently, the family in America had absolutely none of
his music. Ha set out to find and preserve her grandfather’s lost legacy,
documenting the journey with her co-director Victor Velle in Y Van: The Lost
Sounds of Saigon, which screens tonight as the closing selection of the
Houston Asian American Pacific Islander Film Festival.
Aptly,
one of Ha’s friends describes Y Van as the Vietnamese Quincy Jones. He was a
performer in his own right, but he truly composed and arranged all of the biggest
stars’ biggest hits. Unfortunately, he did not live to meet his granddaughter
or to immigrate with her and her family to America. Indeed, his final years
were incredibly hard.
Once
back in Vietnam, Ha scours music stores, but pre-1975 records just aren’t there
to be found. Eventually, she and mother, executive producer Tuyen Tran, take a
page out of the old record-hunters’ book, calling their family’s old friends,
who refer them to other friends, and so on. Eventually, she is referred to a
super-collector who truly deserves to be called an archivist.
Most people know Roberto Rossellini from his classic Italian Neo-Realist films and his
scandalous love affairs. This documentary is about neither. Okay, maybe there
is a little of the latter. Nevertheless, he had already severed his
relationship with Anna Magnani and Ingrid Bergman has one foot out the door when
directors Ilaria de Laurentiis, Rafaele Brunetti, and Andrea Paolo Massara pick-up
the story of his life in the documentary Roberto Rossellini: Living Without
a Script, which screens tomorrow as part of Open Roads: New Italian Cinema 2026.
Throughout
the film, Rossellini sounds much like Miles Davis, repeatedly telling admirers
that of they like his 1950s Neo-Realist classics, they should just re-watch those
old films—but they no longer interested him. Instead, he developed a fascination
with India, which he hoped to document in a non-fiction film. The filmmakers
and commentators clearly imply Bergman dismissed such ambitions as a pipe dream
(especially given their increasingly dire financial straits), until Nehru
greased the wheels for the production of what became India: Matri Bhumi.
It was
a slow production, because Rossellini spent so much time wooing his future wife
Sonali Senroy DasGupta, his ostensive co-screenwriter. Yes, he was still
technically married at the time they met, but to be fair, so was DasGupta. See,
there’s still plenty of good stuff left to cover in Living Without a Script.
In fact, it almost functions as a sequel to Francesco Patierno’s The War of the Volcanoes, which reveled in the gossip surrounding the start of his
relationship with Bergman.
Yet,
despite the considerable time devoted to Rossellini’s romance with DasGupta,
the discussion of the filmmaker’s nonfiction television output will be new to a
lot of viewers. Most of it remains hard to find outside Italy, perhaps with
good reason, because a good deal of what we see in Living Without a Script
looks rather dated.
This documentary almost didn’t exist. Had Trump appointed retired astronaut NASA
Administrator after she addressed the 2016 RNC Convention, as some speculated
he might, there is no way this film would have been made. Nevertheless, she
remains and will always be the first woman to both pilot and command Space Shuttle
missions. Yet, former NASA flight director Paul Hill argues Collins’contributions
to the American space program were far more important than her famous “firsts”
in Hannah Berryman’s documentary, Spacewoman, which opens tomorrow in
LA.
Nothing
was ever handed to Eileen Collins. She grew up in a working-class Upstate New
York household, constantly dealing with her family’s issues of addiction,
mental health, and abuse. Yet, by working multiple jobs, she paid for her
initial flying lessons. Graduating into the U.S. Air Force through the ROTC,
she aspired to join the astronaut program. To gain the necessary flight expertise
and hours, she became an Air Force test pilot. Along the way, she met and
married her husband, Pat Youngs, who left the Air Force to become a commercial
airline pilot. It allowed him to support her career, but still relate to some
of her aeronautical challenges.
It was
a lot harder for their daughter Bridgit Youngs, who was just old enough to understand
the Challenger disaster. Indeed, the memory of the explosion was still fresh when
Collins was selected for her first mission—her first “first,” piloting the Discovery
and docking with the Russian Mir (way back in 1995, before Russia reverted to
authoritarianism).
In
1999, she also became the first woman to command a Shuttle mission. Yet, as
Hill compellingly argues, her most important command was not her first. It was STS-114,
the so-called “Return to Space,” after the Columbia tragedy. Despite all the
scrutiny, the mission developed potentially fatal complications, which Collins
and her colleagues, primarily Hill and former Shuttle program manager Wayne Hale,
thoroughly explain in dramatic but lucid and easily understood terms.
The mid 1990s were a golden era for Jack Russell Terriers. There was Eddie (played
by Moose) on Fraser and Milo (played by Max) in the movie The Mask.
However, Wishbone (played by Soccer) was the star of his own show. As a bonus,
it was also educational. Frankly, it was exactly the sort of programing PBS was
supposed to produce, but they mismanaged it. Nevertheless, Wishbone and the late,
great Soccer remain beloved by cast, crew, and fans, who fondly remember the
dog and his show in Joey Stewart’s documentary What’s the Story, Wishbone,
which starts airing tomorrow on participating PBS stations.
Rick
Duffield started with a vague notion to produce an educational TV program in
the Dallas area that evolved into a pitch-kit that PBS greenlighted for a five-episode
trial, much to everyone’s surprise. Yet, being a crew outside of LA, they could
quickly adapt. Somehow, they started turning out their initial order, which were
so well received, PBS came back with a full season order of 40 episodes. Again,
they were shocked, but again, the cast and crew knuckled down and cranked out episodes.
It
helped that everyone believed in the show and generally loved Wishbone/Soccer.
In fact, it seems like there were almost no personality conflicts, judging from
the extensive interviews Stewart incorporates throughout the film. Consequently,
anyone hoping to learn about Wishbone’s dirty secrets will be bitterly
disappointed.
Of course,
everyone loves Wishbone. To prove the point, Stewart opens with tributes from
Pres. George W. Bush and his sworn enemy, Dan Rather. It is easy to see why.
Soccer was enormously photogenic and cinematic. He was also surprisingly easy
to work with. According to the series cinematographer, Soccer consistently hit
his marks (perhaps with better reliability than some human actors we could
think of). The canine performer was also unusually cooperative when it came to wearing
his period costumes.
Watching
Stewart’s doc gives viewers a fuller understanding of the craftsmanship that
went into each episode, including the special effects supervised by ILM alumnus
Caris Palm Turpen. However, PBS was determined to “a strip it,” but that required
a constant flow of new daily Monday-Friday episodes, which the economics of the
show simply could not accommodate. However, Showtime helped finance the show’s
big send-off, Wishbone’s Dog Days of the West.
As Suzanna Martha Frederika Van Osch embraced the horror genre, she added the additional
“Z.” It was a shrewd decision, whereas opinions vary quite drastically regarding
her second marriage. Regardless, “Suzzanna,” as she was affectionately known
and billed (like Cher and Madonna) remains the face of 1980s Indonesia horror
for fans both foreign and domestic. David Gregory chronicles her life and
career in the documentary The Queen of Black Magic, which is included in
the Severin Film Suzzanna boxset releasing tomorrow on BluRay.
Early
in her career, Suzanna (with one “Z”) was practically Indonesia’s sweetheart. She
appeared in sentimental dramas and even recorded sugary pop records with her
first husband, fellow thesp and frequent co-star Dicky Suprapto. During the
1970s, she started making more exploitative genre movies for less formal “Layar
Tancap” cinemas, often projected on bedsheets for neighborhoods without brick-and-mortar
theaters. Of course, they loved her.
Suzzanna
(with two Z’s) only made one horror in the 1970’s, but it became a sort of prototype
for her 80’s output. In 1983, she also made an exploitation film about a mother’s
lurid relationship with her estranged son, played by teenaged Clift
Sangra, who in real-life became her second husband. Weirdly, he also portrayed
her son in her final film.
To make things even more awkward, many of Suzzanna’s friends and family members
clearly suspected him of complicity in her death. Some even accused him of
trying to contract her murder. While Sangra sat for extensive interviews, he
emerges as his own worst advocate. Sangra never legally compromises himself,
but he just radiates bad vibes.
Its first IP deals were relatively modest, licensing British radio shows like Dick
Barton and The Man in Black for extremely B-level movie treatments. However,
it most famously relaunched popular franchises with the very same monsters that
made Universal the home for horror in the 1930s and 1940s. Despite periods of
decline and dormancy, the Hammer name still means something to fans. Director
Benjamin Field and an all-star cast of genre filmmakers chronicle the studio’s
history and celebrate its eccentricities in Hammer: Heroes, Legends and
Monsters (oddly, no Oxford comma), which releases today on BluRay from UK
specialty retailers.
Will
Hinds (who performed vaudeville under his stage name, Hammer) and Enriques
Carreras founded Hammer Film Productions, but they never really got filmmaking the
way their sons, Tony Hinds and Michael Carreras, did. For the record, most of
the oddball genre detours were Michael’s doing (fault). However, the elder
Carreras definitely understood business, negotiating better American deals than
were available for more prestigious British productions.
Hammer’s
big opportunity came in licensing a film version of The Quatermass Experiment,
which had been a surprise hit for the BBC. They were subsequently pitched a Frankenstein
screenplay that probably would have prompted a lawsuit from Universal, but
they liked the idea enough to commission The Curse of Frankenstein,
which was a huge hit, making stars of Peter Cushing and Chriostopher Lee. They
followed it up with Horror of Dracula, featuring the same co-stars,
garnering the same box office success.
Unlike
many cinema history docs, Heroes, Legends and Monsters focuses more on
the behind-the-scenes business trends and the contributions of below-the-line
contributors, like makeup artist Phil Leakey and art director Bernard Robinson,
who had a thrifty knack for reusing and repurposing old props and sets. Thanks
to Robinson, Hammer could really stretch their budget, while maintaining their
signature lush, gothic look.
Of
course, most of the great stars of Hammer, such as Cushing, Lee, Andre Morrell,
Shane Briant, and Oliver Reed are no longer with us. However, Martine Beswick (One
Million Years B.C.), Caroline Munro (Dracula AD 1972), and Madeline
Smith (The Vampire Lovers) discuss their work at Hammer (and the degree
of nudity that was expected of them, during the late period of decline).
Indeed,
the collected experts convincingly argue the turn towards cultural permissiveness
was Hammer’s undoing, because they had developed such a knack for arguing, negotiating,
and generally sneaking in suggestive material, which suddenly appeared tame
compared to the genuinely explicit releases from their competitors.
The
understanding of the economics of Hammer’s decisions helps differentiate Heroes,
Legends and Monsters from its many predecessors. It also features many
experts with serious genre cred, including John Carpenter, Tim Burton, John
Landis, and Joe Dante (the latter two seem to mostly work as documentary
talking heads these days, which is sort of a shame, but their enthusiasm for
Hammer sounds genuine).
The United States made him an honorary citizen, after the Soviet Union made him
disappear. The Swedish diplomat in question had saved thousands of Hungarian
Jews by issuing them Swedish papers and providing shelter in diplomatically
protected buildings. He became one of the most prominent men in Hungary (thereby
making him a threat to the Soviets’ plans to dominate the nation). Decades
later, his fate remains shrouded in secrecy. Filmmakers Brian Mait & Brad
Rothschild largely settle that question, but as viewers might expect, it is not
an especially uplifting answer that they reveal in their documentary, Raoul
Wallenberg: Missing Inaction, which screens during this year’s JxJ Washington Jewish Film and Music Festival.
As
viewers ought to know from watching the Richard Chamberlain mini-series and
prior documentaries, like Alexander Rodnyaskiy’s The Mission of Raoul Wallenberg, the Swedish humanitarian tried to save as many Hungarian Jews
as possible. He even pulled dozens of Jews off a transport bound for Auschwitz,
openly defying the Arrow Cross.
The
part of the story that isn’t as well publicized involves the rest of the
Wallenberg family. Although Wallenberg was adored by his distinguished grandfather
Gustav, Wallenberg and his mother (who married into the family) were the poor
relations, after his father’s untimely death. His uncles, Jacob and Marcus, who
controlled the family banking empire, declined to hire their nephew. Instead,
they referred him to Klarman Lauer’s trading company.
Wallenberg
became Lauer’s right-hand man, because he could travel more easily than the Jewish
Hungarian. Similarly, he became the on-the-ground point-person for the humanitarian
mission to Hungary organized by Lauer and Iver C. Olsen of the OSS, who emerges
as another admirable figure in Mait & Rothschild’s doc.
However,
the activities of Wallenberg’s uncles were not so edifying. In fact, their extensive
dealings with the National Socialists earned them Treasury Department sanctions,
which continued after the War. Unable to do business with America, they started
brokering deals with the Soviets, the other great totalitarian regime of the 20th
Century. However, they cut ties with the USSR, in exchange for their removal from
the blacklist.
The
filmmakers and their on-camera experts suggest, with good reason, the noble
Wallenberg became a pawn in his uncles’ game with the Soviets. Once they
cancelled their financial arrangements, Raoul Wallenberg was probably as good
as dead. Regardless of their reasons, Wallenberg was most likely executed around
this time. That theory is supported, rather candidly, by Sergey Stepashin, the
former Russian Prime Minister and director of the FSB (then known as the FSK),
under Yeltsin—a sit-down interview even the filmmakers were shocked to score.
Unlike
previous Wallenberg films, Missing Inaction (not a great title) also documents
how much it emotionally exhausted his branch of the family to fight for the
truth. Tragically, some of those closest to him eventually committed suicide.
Not every Ukrainian who serves their country wears a uniform. However, the volunteer evacuation
teams still very definitely risk their lives. They travel into neighborhoods
under bombardment to rescue the elderly and infirm—and their pets too.
Filmmaker Ivan Sautkin was one of them. He made this documentary while
desperately shuttling his most vulnerable countrymen to relative safety.
American paramedic Pete Reed was also part of the team, but he didn’t live to
see Sautkin’s film, A Poem for Little People, which is now streaming on
OVID.tv.
This
is a terrible title, but it comes from a terrific scene, focusing on the
elderly Taisia as she reads the blistering poem she wrote (in Russian) for the
Russian soldiers committing Putin’s war crimes. She allows them no illusions regarding
their illegal dirty business in Ukraine.
Taisia
probably isn’t going anywhere because her downstairs crony Zinaida is
definitely staying put. She watches the motorway outside her window, calling in
every Russian vehicle that passes to the Ukrainian defense force. They are the
exceptions to the rule. In most cases, Anton, the team leader, uses grimly
accurate language to convince the elderly to leave their homes.
Regardless
of the title, Sautkin’s film puts a human face on Putin’s war crimes, over and
over and over again. Frankly, the suffering and destruction it documents ought
to be more shocking, yet such images have been disseminated quite widely—but people
of bad faith keep ignoring them.
Here is an incovenient but telling truth for your consideration. When the Islamist Ruhollah
Khomeini first launched his revolution against the Shah in 1963, he wasn’t
motivated by corruption or the SAVAK secret police. He was outraged by the Shah’s
decision to grant women the right to vote. Yet, Jimmy Carter believed Iran
would better served with Khomeini as its ruler. Most Iranian women knew better.
By now, most of the Iranian men agree. However, for decades, women were in the
vanguard of the Iranian resistance movement. Iranian filmmaker Raha Shirazi and
several leading Iranian women dissidents take stock of the rights they lost after
the Islamic Revolution and their long continuing campaign to win them back in
her documentary A War on Women, which screens again after its premiere
at this year’s Hot Docs festival.
During
the Shah’s reign, women’s rights were steadily improving. They could dress however
they pleased and could pursue their education as far as their talents allowed.
They could also sing and dance in public and show their hair, without fear of
acid attacks. Mahnaz Afkhami knows this better than anyone, because she was
Minister for Women’s Affairs in the 1978 government. As she explains, she was
in New York forming a United Nation’s subsidiary devoted to women’s rights when
the Shah fell. For her own safety, she never returned home.
Indeed,
Shirazi assembled a small but powerful cast of expert witnesses, who testify first-hand
regarding the systematic oppression of women by the current Iranian regime. Several
have paid dearly for their free-thinking, such as Elahe Tavakolian, who was
blinded in one eye when the Iranian “Morality Police” shot her during a “Woman,
Life, Freedom” protest.
Likewise,
Shaparak Shajarizadeh became an international online cause celeb after she was
arrested for removing her headscarf. Journalist Masih Alinejad and actress Golshifteh
Farhani (formerly considered the rough equivalent of Iran’s “sweetheart”)
movingly discuss the pain of exile and the deep, gnawing fear for loved ones
left behind.
After
watching the women’s harrowing and heartbreaking testimony elicited by Shirazi,
any morally tone-deaf ideologue who protested on behalf of the Iranian regime
should feel profound shame and stomach-churning embarrassment. Regardless, of
your opinions of Trump’s management of the military conflict, it is clear the
Iranian people would be much better off without their current oppressors.
Funny Girl, The Other Side of the Mountain, and Shampoo were among the top 10 highest
grossing movies of 1975, but nobody today would want to watch a feature length
doc about any of them. In contrast, The Rocky Horror Picture Picture Show was not in
the top ten by the time the year ended, but it subsequently rose to become 1975’s
third highest grossing picture, because it never left theaters. For decades, it has been recognized as a
phenomenon and it remains so, despite the availability of BluRays and
streaming. Filmmaker Linus O’Brien chronicles the film’s history and takes
stock of its legacy with its creator, his father Richard O’Brien, in the documentary
Strange Journey: The Story of Rocky Horror, which returns to theaters
this Friday.
It
started as a stage show in a proper theater’s experimental side stage, where blokes
like writer-composer O’Brien and director Jim Sharman could do whatever they
wanted, because nobody would be watching. However, right from the start, the
show was a smash hit, earning extensions and a transfer to a larger theater.
Eventually,
the show was imported to Los Angeles, where it had equal or greater success at
the Roxy, an appropriately hipster venue. It still wouldn’t necessarily be an
obvious fit for Hollywood, but producer Lou Adler saw the commercial potential
(as it happens, he also produced Cheech & Chong’ Up in Smoke). Indeed,
Adler worked closely with the only sympathetic Fox exec to develop the film’s
midnight screening strategy, after its initial release bombed.
Obviously,
O’Brien had guaranteed access to his father. His connections also secured
interviews with Sharman, Adler, and just about every other living cast-member,
including Tim Curry, Barry Bostwick and Susan Sarandon. It is a little creepy
seeing Sarandon, considering her recent history, including retweeting a “woke-right” extremist consprcy theeorist claiming the October 7th massacre was an Israeli false flag
operation, but there is no denying she is a big part of the film’s history, so
she should be there.
Fortunately,
the scenes featuring the O’Brien, father and son, are quite endearing. Clearly,
the film director grew-up amid the “strangeness” of the Rocky Horror world
and quickly acclimated to it. He gets a lot of good stuff from his dad,
including highly candid responses and some impromptu musical performances. This
might sacrilegious to the Rocky faithful, but some might consider his
solo acoustic renditions superior to the big, blaring stage orchestrations.
What is it like to come out as non-binary in today’s China? Artist-filmmaker Viv Li
is reluctant to find out. To a large degree, she has adopted the norms and
values of the Grman hipster art-world, but she still wants to identify as
Chinese. Through her very personal lens, the audience gets an unvarnished
perspective on both worlds in Li’s Two Mountains Weighing Down on My Chest,
which screens during this year’s New Directors/New Films.
Weirdly,
there just might be something to annoy everyone in Li’s film, which is
absolutely a point in its favor. Through her German friends she engages in
various forms of nudist “decadence” (as the Maoists back home might say). Indeed,
a great deal of the pretentious art produced by her circle will truly underwhelm
the average working-class stiff, from either China or the West.
Yet,
when Li returns home, she is clearly put off by her relatives’ idolization of
Mao and Xi. She tries to hold her tongue and avoid politics, but she has to
scoff when they claim the majority of American homes lack basic necessities,
like electrified power. Indeed, regardless, of your take on the art produced by
Li’s friends, her film vividly documents the dubious nature of CCP propaganda
and just how desperately older Chinese generations want to believe it.
Arguably, Alfred Hitchcock and Roger Corman most indelibly personify filmmaking
for several generations of American genre film fans, thanks to their droll
media appearances. And so they should, because their lasting influence matches their
wit. Sure, Corman made a lot of Z-grade exploitation films, but many of them,
like Little Shop of Horrors, blossomed into a weird, unlikely immortality.
Plus, nobody had better “making of” stories than Roger Corman. The venerable master
regales viewers with some of them in Bertrand Tessier’s Roger Corman: The
Pope of Pop Cinema, which airs tonight on TCM.
Who
couldn’t listen to Roger Corman stories all night? Many of the famous directors
he mentored could also tell Corman stories all night, as well. Once again, Ron
Howard, Joe Dante, Allann Arkush, and Peter Bogdanovich reminisce about the man
who gave them their start directing, as they had in Alex Stapleton’s Corman’s World, which is admittedly longer and more comprehensive.
Sadly,
Corman alumnus Jonathan Demme had already passed away by the time Pope of
Pop was produced. Nevertheless, Tessier’s short fiftysome minute film covers
some new material, addressing some of Corman’s late career triumphs, such as
the money he made from the straight-to-VOD sequels to the Death Race 2000 remake
and the sale of the title to his1950s hot-rod movie, The Fast and the
Furious, to Universal. In fact, Death Race (2008) director Paul W.S.
Anderson also offers his memories of the Hollywood icon.