Periodically, there are campaigns to revive the lost practice of letter writing. This
film could be part of that effort—and it makes a compelling case. It also
represents the road rarely taken by video game film adaptations. It is inspired
by Kadokawa’s “visual novel” mystery game, but even faithful players might not
realize the connection if they weren’t informed by the opening credits. Yet,
Sonja O’Hara’s Root Letter deserves credit for being its own thing when
it releases tomorrow in theaters and on-demand.
Carlos
Alvarez is the hard-working son of an immigrant maid in Oklahoma and Sarah
Blake is the frustrated daughter of an opioid-addicted single mother in Baton
Rouge. They have very different tastes in music, but they find they can relate
to each other when assigned to be pen pals, through their high school English classes.
In fact, they keep exchanging letters, even after the project ends—and then
Blake goes quiet.
Alvarez
could tell something was very wrong from the last letters he received, so he
drives to Baton Rouge looking for her. It will not be easy, since he does not
even know what she looks like. Starting with her school contact info, Alvarez
tracks down her deadbeat fair-weather oxy-addled friends. They claim to know nothing,
but the way they say so holds a great deal of menace.
Root
Letter is
about as slow and brooding as a film can get and still be considered a thriller,
but that is arguably a neat trick to pull off. O’Hara and screenwriter David
Ebeltoft have a great deal of compassion and sympathy for their pen pal
protagonists—and they are relatively forgiving of hardscrabble world they
inhabit. Nearly every character in this film is a victim to some extent—the
question is how they respond to their circumstances.
Still,
it probably wouldn’t have killed O’Hara to stir the pot a tad more vigorously.
However, she gets some great work from her young cast. Danny Ramirez (whom the
press materials are eager to remind us played Fanboy in Top Gun: Maverick,
which is definitely a seriously cool credit) brings an old school understated
film noir intensity to the film as Alvarez.
In Manhattan and Los Angeles, we have progressive district attorneys,
who proudly refuse to prosecute criminals. People no longer feel safe in those
communities, which also happen to be major hubs of film production. Consequently, you
can expect a major boom for home invasion horror, like this film. In this case,
writer-director Duncan Birmingham tries to soften the blow with some gun
culture criticism, but the fact remains Margo and Adam are not safe in their
own home, just like the rest of LA. It is their turn to deal with the
lawlessness in Duncan Birmingham’s Who Invited Them, which premieres
Thursday on Shudder.
Technically,
Tom and Sasha did not “invade.” They crashed Adam’s house-warming party. Margo
really doesn’t feel like it is her party too. That reflects some of the
fissures in their marriage the uninvited guests will exploit. After all the real
guests leave, the couple pops out of the bathroom, claiming to be the next-door
neighbors. They seem hip and connected, so Adam instinctively cozies up to
them. Both Tom and Sasha have a knack for pushing their buttons, so for a while,
it feels more like a Polanski film than Last House on the Left. Things
get super uncomfortable, but the threat of violence is not imminent (but
perhaps implied).
In
fact, the verbal sparring is clearly the part that interests Birmingham,
because when the film reverts to the violent business at-hand, it follows the
usual, uninspired, rote pattern. He also wraps it up as quickly as possible,
only pausing to show a firearm wielded in a way that would disgust any actual
gun owner.
Despite
Birmingham’s labored efforts, Who Invited Them still makes a persuasive case
for gun ownership. There are dangerous, evil people out there, whom Angelinos
have to face on their own. Of course, our DAs would offer victims the chance to
face the psychopaths who duct-taped them up in group therapy “Restorative
Justice” sessions, rather than sending to prison. Yet, somehow, that probably
would not be much of a “healing” experience for Margo and Adam, after what they
endure at the hands of Tom and Sasha.
If
you can’t afford the Stranger Things pinball machine, you can at
least read this book instead. In it, a trio of Eighties kids encounter
the pinball equivalent of the Polybius arcade game, but instead of Men in
Black, it runs on black magic. The scrawniest of the three falls victim to its
power, but his other two friends will not uncover the truth until the 1990s in
Sara Farizan’s YA novel, Dead Flip, which goes on-sale today.
Maziyar
“Maz” Shahzad, Corinne “Cori” O’Brien, and Sam Bennett had always been inseparable,
united by their geekly passions, but they were on the verge of the age when
their coed friendship would get awkward. Halloween 1987 might have been their
final time trick or treating together, even if Bennett had not mysteriously
disappeared that night. Upset that his friends had opted for a party with the
popular kids instead of visiting more houses, Bennett was drawn to the newly
refurbished pinball machine at their favorite convenience store.
Shahzad
also had a weird physical reaction to the Wizard-themed machine, but it really
got its hooks into Bennett. Somehow, it made the young boy disappear. At least,
that is what Shahzad always thought, but he couldn’t really verbalize the
suspicion, because it would sound crazy. Instead, the guilt he carried affected
his grades and his emotional well-being. He and O’Brien drifted apart,
especially after he transferred to a new school. By chance, he and O’Brien bump
into each other at the mall in 1993, which providentially reawakens their
memories of 1987, just in time for a major new development in the case. Of course,
it is too crazy for them to bring to parents, so they will have to deal with it
together and with the help of a few of their new friends.
Occasionally,
Farizan uses turns of phrase that would have sounds out of place in either the
golden age of the 1980s or the bad old 1990s, but there is a good deal of on-target,
era-appropriate nostalgia (plenty of Monster Squad references, but no
Cannon action movies). Generally, she accurately captures the tone of a
childhood without social media. The Stranger Things comps are
unavoidable, but the Polybius urban legend was much more of a model for the
story.
Yet,
it is the relationship between the old friends and their new friendships that
will keep the younger intended audience reading. At times, O’Brien and Shahzad’s
devotion to the imperiled Bennett is quite poignant. It is also rewarding to
see these central characters growing up and taking responsibility for their lives,
especially under such extraordinary circumstances.
Unfortunately,
there are a few interior monologues from O’Brien complaining about the unfair
social demands of high school life for an in-the-closet young woman like that
go on a little too long. Yet, that kind of content is demanded by the YA literary
gate-keepers these days, and they don’t appreciate subtlety, so there it is. At
least regular readers can blow through them relatively quickly and get back to
a good story.
And it is a good
story, nicely told. Perhaps most impressively, Farizan nicely handles the
constant flashbacks and flashforwards, skillfully using them for dramatic
effect. Recommended for teens who enjoy retro 19980s horror and Gen X parents, Dead
Flip is now on-sale wherever books are sold.
This is just a reminder Patricia Highsmith also wrote books. It will be
important to keep that in mind during this documentary, because it relentlessly
focuses on the private life she wanted to keep private. As a result, Highsmith
most likely would have been horrified by Eva Vitija’s Loving Highsmith,
which opens Friday at Film Forum.
Throughout
her life, Highsmith kept journals she did not want other people to read. In
fact, she wrote large notes at the beginning of later journals emphasizing what
she wrote within was for her eyes only. Vitija excerpts those diaries
extensively throughout Loving Highsmith.
For
the first six years of her life, Highsmith lived with her grandmother in Texas
and consequently always retained some sense of being a Southerner. In fact, you
can somewhat see a Flannery O’Connor sensibility in her work, especially in
regards to the dark side of human nature. The Texas relatives Vitija interviews
seem relatively accepting of her sexuality, but they are still a bit surprised
when the filmmaker informs them Highsmith once had a fling with her cousin.
Highsmith
made her name with Strangers on a Train, but Hitchcock is only mentioned
in passing. However, the novel Carol (a.k.a. The Price of Salt)
is discussed at length, because of its lesbian themes. There is a bit of
discussion of Tom Ripley, her signature anti-hero, but a great deal of that
centers on the fourth book, The Boy Who Followed Ripley, because it was
partially shaped by one of her own romantic relationships.
Loving
Highsmith will
make viewers miss the Formalist school of literary criticism, which held it did
not matter who or what an author might be. The only valid question was whether
the book was any good. Instead, it is clear Vitija is only documenting
Highsmith because of her sexuality. Her work is of secondary importance.
That
is a shame, because Highsmith is a hugely significant writer, who arguably
transcends genre. She has inspired filmmakers like Hitchcock, Claude Chabrol,
Claude Miller, Rene Clement, Wim Wenders, Todd Haynes, and even Sam Fuller (who
helmed an episode of the Chillers anthology, based on her short
stories). Indeed, the most interesting sequences are those in which Highsmith
explains her books are not really about crime or murder, but the feeling of
guilt, or the absence thereof.
Arthur Kipps' assignment sounds like a nightmare from Hell: one solid week of
paperwork. He is supposed to organize the ratty old papers of the late Alice
Drabow, the former owner of Eel Marsh House. Frankly, the visitation of a vengeful
ghostly woman sounds like a welcome distraction from such drudgery, but
unfortunately, her appearances are a harbinger for yet another child dying in
the beleaguered local village. Despite the tragedies, poor Kipps still has to
get all those blasted papers in order in James Watkins’ Hammer-produced The
Woman in Black, which airs Thursday on Comet.
Kipps’
beloved wife died in childbirth, leaving him to raise their son Joseph on his own.
The senior partner of his proper Edwardian firm says he is sympathetic to Kipps’
situation, which means he really isn’t. Regardless, Kipps must sort out the
Drabow estate if he is to have a future with the firm. Unfortunately, the local
solicitor has been decidedly uncooperative, so Kipps must go to Eel Marsh House
and process all the paperwork, so they can clear the title for the prospective
heirs.
Of
course, he receives a nasty welcome from all the locals, except the wealthy and
skeptical Sam Daily. Yet, he too lost his young son in an incident attributed
to the Woman in Black. According to legend, whenever she is seen, a child dies through
an act of self-destruction. As a result, Kipps only makes things worse for
himself in the village when he asks about the strange woman he has seen around the
Eel Marsh grounds. Children do indeed start dying, which is especially alarming
to him, since Joseph and his nanny are scheduled to visit over the weekend.
Woman
in Black is
an entertaining gothic throwback, which made it an altogether fitting
production for the relaunched Hammer Films. As well as channeling vintage
Hammer, Watkins also picked up a step or two from films like Bayona’s The Orphanage,
using the full frame to tease viewers with shadowy figures, half-seen from down
long hallways. Yet, the wonderfully lush and decaying set designs are pure
vintage Hammer. Plus, the isolation of Eel Marsh House, built atop a rise in
tidal basin that is inaccessible during high tide, lends the film additional
claustrophobic creepiness.
Since
Daniel Radcliffe now shuns J.K. Rowling as a heretic who should be burned at
the stake, this could be his new favorite film. It is the second screen
adaptation of Hill’s novel, following a 1989 BBC production, and the first to
spawn an original sequel. It is refreshingly atmospheric and suggestive, rather
than bluntly gory.
This team of superheroes certainly holds franchise possibilities. That would delight
the low-budget film company The Asylum, because the characters are based on the
gods of ancient civilizations and therefore fair game for their “mockbuster” coattail
riders, like for instance their recent Thor: God of Thunder (not “Love
and Thunder”). Thor is not one of the Godlings, or their allies, but they will
meet Brokkr, one of the dwarves who forged his legendary hammer. Unfortunately,
an evil Mesopotamian goddess is threatening the Godlings and the world they
protect in Luke C Jackson’s graphic novel Godlings and the Gates of Chaos,
which is now on-sale.
Milo
just thought he was a fun-loving teen, with a talent for magic tricks that was
sometimes actually magical. However, he is the mortal incarnation of the Greek
god Dionysus. Fortunately, his once and future colleagues with the Knights of
Horus found him when their enemies were about to assassinate him. Like it or
not, he is the newest member of the team, along with Diana (whom he vaguely
remembers as Artmeis), Ra (the Egyptian sun deity), and Chaac (the Mayan rain
deity).
However,
he won’t be the new guy for long. They soon recruit Tiamat, the Babylonian
goddess of destruction. Her latest physical form is still young and immature,
but she is extremely powerful. She is also a bit unstable, which is why the minions
of Irkalla, the Queen of the Mesopotamian underworld try to lure her to the
dark side. She has plans Tiamat could help advance.
The
concept of the Godlings is not radically original (basically Marvel’s Thor and
the Avengers crossed with Percy Jackson), but Luke C Jackson forgoes a lot of
the obvious usual suspects, for a broader selection of heroes. Instead of yet
another Hercules, he gives us Dionysus and Nemesis, who is currently estranged
from the Godlings, because they are not sufficiently retributive for her tastes.
Jackson does not slavishly mold the young heroes’ personalities to match their
ancient personas, but he generally captures the broad strokes of their powers
and iconic traits. That might be a plus, especially if Godlings inspires
some young readers to take a deep dive into ancient history and religions.
The art credited to
Caravan Studio is energetic and the action scenes are easy to follow. It is
colorful and accessible for the younger demographic, but the wealth of
historical sources will intrigue some older superhero fans, as well. Again, the
Godlings are hardly unprecedented, but they are solidly executed for what they
are. Recommended for young superhero readers looking for something a little
different from the big two corporate universes, Godlings and the Gates of
Chaos is now available from Magnetic Force.
If you are an anti-social misanthrope who enjoys laughing at other people’s
freakish misfortunes, you are probably a consumer of underground comix, from
the likes of R. Crumb. Nobody is forcing you. Of course, most fans like young
Robert are convinced there are great truths in those baroquely gross pages. He
has a talent for drawing comics like his idols, but not for healthy human
relationships, as we see in painful detail throughout Owen Kline’s
wince-inducing Funny Pages, which opens today in New York.
Mr.
Kitano, Robert’s high school art teacher, always got him. Unfortunately, he is
killed in a freak accident, after an awkward nude modeling incident with his
student. You can tell right from the start this film will spare us nothing.
In
defiance of his conventional parents, Robert announces he will pass on college,
to pursue a career in comics. He will not be living under their roof either, to
prevent them from playing that parental card. Since his only income comes from
part-time work at the comic book store, Robert takes a shared room in an
illegal basement apartment in Trenton, with two old perverts. What he really
needs is a mentor and thinks he might have found one in Wallace, a former
color-separator from Image Comics. Unfortunately, Wallace is an on-spectrum
neurotic with impulse control issues that border on psychosis.
Funny
Pages is
unpleasant, but that certainly makes it true to the spirit of the underground
comix that partially inspired it. Kline and his cast make Ghost World look
innocent and uplifting. As result, the film hardly feels like any sort of love
letter to comics—more like an indictment.
Daniel
Zolghari is relentlessly abrasive and charmless as Robert. That means the young
thesp takes direction well, but that doesn’t make his performance any easier to
watch. Matthew Maher is also spectacularly ticky and creepy as Wallace, which
is definitely something.
As a scholar of myth and folklore, Alithea Binnie is familiar with the Twilight
Zone episode “The Man in the Bottle,” or similar such tales. She expects
the magical granting of wishes to necessarily result in ironic unintended
consequences. Yet, the djinn offering her wishes has a good point when he
argues she has free will, doesn’t she, so why should she be bound by the fate
of others? However, when he tells her his story, he gives her plenty of
examples of things not to wish for in George Miller’s Three Thousand Years
of Longing, which opens tomorrow in theaters.
Binnie
is used to academic conferences, but there has been something a little off
about this gathering in Istanbul. It must be fate, or something, that soon
guides her to pick up an old but supposedly valueless bottle in a bazaar. Guess
what’s inside. Yes, Idris Elba. The djinn only needs a little time to adjust to
Binnie’s language of choice and her physical scale. Then he must grant her
three wishes, or suffer a terrible fate.
Naturally,
Binnie asks how he got in that bottle in the first place. It is quite an epic
story, spanning thousands of years and featuring a cast of characters including
the likes the Queen of Sheba, King Solomon, and various royal despots from
Byzantine antiquity. Ironically, his tragic history rather reinforces Binnie’s
skepticism regarding wishes, but it also fascinates the Joseph Campbell-ish
scholar.
Admittedly,
Miller has a little trouble wrapping up TTYL (even though it was adapted
from the A.S. Byatt short story “The Djinn in the Nightingale’s Eye"), but his
patience and deft touch has produced a terrific film, loaded with rich visuals
and exotic settings. Somehow, Miller managed to evoke Thief of Baghdad vibes
in a way that should not arouse the professionally offended.
Idris
is about the only thesp who could play the Djinn with the appropriately
imposing physicality and dry wit, while still evoking the sense of an old soul
within. He also generates a lot of heat on screen with Aamito Lagum, as the
Queen of Sheba.
Sometimes you wake up and just don’t feel like saving the world. That is basically
what happened to Paul W.R. The problem is, he is scheduled to do exactly that.
Only he has the sufficient skills to save Earth from a collision with the Red
Moon in Romain Quirot’s Last Journey of Paul W.R., which releases
tomorrow in theaters and on-demand.
One
day, the Red Moon just appeared in the sky, big and ominous looking, but Paul
W.R.’s father Henri recognized it as a source of cheap energy. Unfortunately,
the celestial satellite did not take kindly to being exploited, or at least
that was Paul’s theory. Regardless, the Red Moon shifted into a collision
course with Earth and only Paul W.R. can navigate through its magnetic field to
deliver the explosive charges. Of course, this would be a suicide mission, but
the grateful world has hailed W.R. as its hero and savior.
A
slight complication developed when Paul W.R. disappeared days before doomsday. Dystopian
France’s jackbooted police and surveillance system are on the lookout for him,
but there are a lot of options for hiding out in the wasteland. What does he
want? Maybe he isn’t sure himself.
Paul
W.R. won’t tell us either, because unlike the short film Last Journey of the
Enigmatic Paul W.R., the title character never breaks the fourth wall this
time. He also no longer has the omniscient power to read minds, whether he
wants to or not, so apparently, he really is a lot less “enigmatic.”
Indeed,
Quirot made considerable changes in expanding Paul W.R.’s story to feature
length. Unfortunately, most of them water-down and undermine the poetic poignancy
of the original short. After screening at the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival, it is
now available online here. It is highly recommended, but maybe viewers ought to
just stop there.
One
thing the feature has going for it that the short didn’t is Jean Reno, who plays
Paul’s scientist-industrialist father, with his usual gravitas. This time
around, Paul’s brother Eliott is the one that can read minds, but he picked up
the uncanny talent after he failed to fulfill Paul’s mission. Unfortunately, he
came back changed.
Milos Havel's Barrandov Studios made some great films and some unfortunate propaganda, during both the German and Soviet occupations. However, that leads to some intriguing drama in the Czech series PRIVATE LIVES (airing on EuroChannel and streaming on Freeve). EPOCH TIMES review up here.
You might think it would be easier to fight off hostile aliens in the year
2022 than back in the Fourteenth Century Goryeo Korea, but Earthlings would be
technologically outclassed in either era. At least back then they had magic and
superheroes. In addition to all of the above, this film also has time travel,
so it pretty much has it all. However, it will not necessarily be clear which
alien from the future is inhabiting which human character from the past in director-screenwriter
Choi Dong Hoon’s wildly inventive Alienoid, which opens Friday in New
York.
630
years ago, the Earth’s resident prison warden, simply known as “Guard” and Thunder,
his AI assistant, drove their SUV into Goryeo times to recapture a fugitive
alien. Guard represents a galactic order that imprisons the consciousnesses of
their criminals inside the brains of humans on Earth. In most cases, both the
host and the imprisoned remain unaware of the situation. However, when the
aliens are awakened, they can take control and run amok. In this case, their
fugitive sought to escape into the past. Guard and Thunder nabbed their quarry,
but the collateral damage left infant Ean an orphan.
Stone
cold Guard was willing to abandon her to fate, but the stealthy Thunder smuggled
her back to 2022 for Guard to raise as his daughter. He is not an affectionate
father, but parenthood helps establish his human cover. However, Ean is smart
for her age, so she suspects Guard is involved in something weird.
Meanwhile,
six centuries earlier, Murak, a clumsy, but sometimes powerful Taoist dosa
magician is on a quest to find a legendary blade. Initially, he finds himself
competing against the mysterious “Girl Who Shoots Thunder,” who wields some
very contemporary firearms, but the real threat comes from a cabal of alien
body-snatchers.
Alienoid
is
a crazy kitchen sink movie, filled to the rim with every possible science
fiction and fantasy element imaginable. Yet, it is also highly refreshing,
because it creates a whole new science fiction universe that is not tied into
and carrying the baggage of the Marvel or DC Universes. Hollywood just doesn’t
have this kind of originality or ambition anymore. Is this really the safest or
most cost-efficient way of imprisoning criminals? Probably not, but it
certainly provides the impetus for a lot of crazy and thoroughly entertaining
mayhem.
David Locke wanted to see justice done by the International Criminal Tribunal
for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), but not so surprisingly, he finds the
UN-chartered organization is stymied by politics (imagine that). It is personal
for him, because a Serbian war criminal killed the woman he loved. When he gets
a lead on her killer, the ICTY is too busy winding down its mission and patting
itself on the back, so he goes it alone in director-screenwriter Alastair
Newton Brown’s Here Be Dragons, which screens during this year’s
Cinequest Film & VR Festival.
While
stationed as a UN “Peace-keeper” during the Yugoslav Wars, Locke came face to
face with Ivan Novak, just when he was dumping the bodies of his girlfriend’s
village. Yet, he was ordered to stand down, because his unit was insufficiently
armed and was only authorized to conduct a prisoner exchange. As the top
investigator for the ICTY, he believed Novak had been killed. However, just as
the ICTY announces its dissolution, Locke is approached by his girlfriend’s
brother, Emir Ibrahimovic, the only survivor of the massacre.
Now
a wealthy Swedish industrialist, Ibrahimovic has information regarding Novak’s
whereabouts. It turns out, he is living openly under an assumed name in
Belgrade. To add insult to injury, he currently runs PTSD and reconciliation workshops
for survivors of the civil war.
HBD
is
directly rooted in the events of the early 1990s and 2017, but in terms of tone,
it is very much akin to some of the anti-hero thrillers of the 1970s. Brown
seems to have a bit of a man-crush of the lead actor (and producer) Nathan Clark Sapsford stalking through the dark streets of Belgrade in his half-overcoat,
but to be fair, he is pretty cool looking.
Sapsford
doesn’t merely brood. He plays Locke so tightly-wound, he could snap at any
moment. Yet, he is not an empty existential protag. Throughout it all, Brown
makes it clear the man always holds to some notion of justice. In contrast,
Slobodan Bestic’s Novak is a surprisingly subtle and challenging figure, who tries
to literally embody the notion that healing comes through the passage of time,
rather than cathartic retribution. That is literally what his counseling
argues.
Even the biggest names in jazz often play intimate clubs, so jazz fans have
an unusually good chance of interacting with their favorites. If you go to
up-and-coming musicians’ gigs, you might just make a friend. Some of my
favorite musicians are even in-real-life friends with my entire family. It is
nice to know this can also happen in other musical genres. To illustrate the point,
documentarian Kathleen Ermitage examines the close relationships the Indigo Girls,
jazz pianist Vijay Iyer, and rapper Talib Kweli have with special select fans
in Mixtape Trilogy: Stories of the Power of Music, which screens during
this year’s Cinequest Film & VR Festival.
Sadly,
this film could never screen in China, under the current CCP regime. For one
thing, Indigo Girls super-fan Dylan Yellowlees identifies the Tiananmen Square
Massacre as one of the defining incidents of her late-1980s youth. That would
be simple enough to edit out, but the state censors still would never approve Yellowlees’
open and frank discussion of her coming-out-experience, which largely
overlapped with that of the band’s. Understandably, it was easy for her to identify
with them and she found great meaning in their lyrics. When Yellowlees finally
met them while working as a programmer for a local theater, they got on like a
house on fire.
Likewise,
Iyer found something of a kindred spirit in Garnette Cadogan, a restless
academic with adventurous taste in music. Arguably, this is the most personal
segment of the film, since their relationship appears to be the closest.
Indeed, Iyer often describes Cadogan as a member of his family. Sometimes, Iyer
can be counter-productively didactic, but the greatest controversy he and
Cadogan address in the film is the criticism the pianist does not sufficiently
swing. That is the sort of tired debate that hurts jazz rather than defending
it, so Cadogan was right to call it out. (Indeed, Iyer’s Radha, Radha is
a rich and rewarding composition.)
You can tell from imdb the cast of Eli Roth’s Cannibal Holocaust-inspired
film appeared in many subsequent projects, some even soon after its release.
Nobody died during the shoot and Roth never implied that they did, nor did he
depict any animal killings on-screen, real or simulated. Yet, viewers cannot
miss the spirit of old school Italian cannibal exploitation movies in Roth’s The
Green Inferno, which screens at MoMA, as part of its Messaging the Monstrous: Eco Horror film series, in recognition of its status as a true work of
modern cinematic art.
Initially,
Justine admires the commitment and idealism of Alejandro’s campus “social
justice” organization, but her roommate Kaycee recognizes his charisma as the persuasive
snake oil of a cult leader. Nevertheless, Justine agrees to participate in
their upcoming “action,” in which they will live-stream themselves blocking
bulldozers poised to clear-cut a portion of the Peruvian Amazonian rainforest.
However, she is bitterly disillusioned when Alejandro puts her life at risk, to
capitalize on her father’s position as a UN attorney. Things get worse on the
return trip, when their plane crashes in the middle of hostile indigenous
territory.
Justine
survives with a handful of activists, awkwardly including Alejandro. His
behavior is a bit troubling, especially when he discourages and even actively
hinders escape attempts. It turns out he is a truly hypocritical scumbag—and one
of the most detestable, but distinctly notable movie villains of the
late-twenty-teens.
As
in Deodato’s cult-favorite, a group of privileged Americans (who would traditionally
be profiled as woke hipsters) go to the Amazon and make everything worse. There
might be an environmental message to Green Inferno (don’t raze the rainforest,
because it will have dangerous consequences), but it is the depiction of the
professional activist-class is what really defines the film, because it cuts so
close to the bone. Roth’s screenplay, written with Guillermo Amoedo made a lot
of critics uncomfortable, because there was a lot of truth to it.
Plus, it addresses the practice of Female Genital Mutilation, in ways that
highlight the horror of the practice and undercut cultural relativism. Frankly,
anyone requiring “trigger warnings” should skip this film. It was intended for
grown-ups.
These game designers and gamers aren’t like the characters of One Second After.
Their digitally-dependent lives make them particularly unprepared for the
destruction wrought by an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). However, they think they
unique insight that will help them overcome, because the disaster appears to be
unfolding just like their scenario of the horror-survival game they wrote and
play. Regardless, they must somehow fight their way out of the building in the
six-episode Pulse, which is now streaming on BET+.
The
game of Pulse is personal to Jaz, Caspar, and Errol. They designed it
together and modeled the playable characters after themselves. After selling
out to a big company, they reluctantly made many compromises when designing the
new reboot. Jaz is tired of hearing criticism from Eddie, the building’s
toxic-fan security guard, especially since she largely agrees with him.
Unfortunately,
they all must take Eddie’s notes seriously when an apparent EMP fries all the building’s
electronics. Rather perversely, Eddie starts conducting a deadly Pulse game
in real life, tauntingly challenging Jaz and her colleagues to survive each
deadly level of the building. Originally designed for the state secret service,
the blocky brutalist behemoth has some seriously evil feng shui. It was a scary
place, even before all its occupants started going stark raving mad. First the
EMP started scrambling the electrical charges in everyone’s brains. Then a
carbon monoxide leak drove them into full-blown psychosis.
The
Pulse office was spared the worst effects of the chemicals, but the EMP really
did a number on Jaz. She was already diagnosed with Wonderland Syndrome (AIWS),
but its effects have been intensified by the electric charge. Ironically, in
the game, her character’s AIWS gives her an advantage to see beyond the
deceptions of ostensive reality, which also might now be the case for Jaz in
real life too.
Admittedly,
Pulse has issues with logic, but it was clearly made by and for survival
horror video game players. Everyone who was disappointed in Netflix’s utterly
dreadful Resident Evil reboot (probably the worst series of the year),
should watch Pulse instead. It is a high energy, often bloody
celebration of mayhem, which also features some absolutely crazy, but weirdly
satisfying twists. Most of what fans want from Resident Evil they can
find here.
You will learn more watching a few hours of the Food Network than from
attending this casual Italian restaurant chain’s special managers’ training
workshop, but it has the distinct advantage of being in Italy. That definitely
interests Amber, who has never been out of Bakersfield. She hopes to find
romance in Italy, but stumbles across trouble in Jeff Baena’s Spin Me Round,
which opens today in New York.
Initially,
it seems like there is a bit of a bait-and-switch going on with the managerial
seminar. They were supposed to stay in founder Nick Martucci’s villa, but
instead they are stuck in a strip mall budget inn. However, when Amber catches
Martucci’s eye, he tries to whisk her off her feet. His loyal assistant Kat
facilitates his courtship, but she also shows an interest in Amber as well.
Much
to Amber’s surprise, all the attention ends just as suddenly as it began. Martucci
appears to be romancing other women in the program, while Kat mysteriously
disappears. She starts to suspect it is all some sort of sleazy grooming
operation, especially when her colleague Dana reveals he and his fellow manager
Fran are two of the only men to ever participate in the program. They also both
happen to have names commonly associated with women.
Spin
has
a reasonably promising premise, but it was not sufficiently developed. Frankly,
it only really gets funny when Amber and Dana team-up to sleuth out the truth behind
their seminar. Alison Brie and Zach Woods bounce off each other nicely in these
sequences. However, most of the first half of the film just tries to force
laughs out of uncomfortable situations. It does not help that Spin features
several thesps whom the dictation-taking entertainment press keeps trying to
convince us are funny, but they really aren’t, such as Fred Armisen and Molly
Shannon. True to form, they just sap the energy out of Spin.
This entire film is a spoiler alert for its possible franchise, because if
you haven’t already seen Jaume Collet-Serra’s Orphan (released in 2009),
it reveals the original film’s big shocking twist in the first ten minutes. There
is a very good reason nasty little Leena has been confined to an Estonian
asylum for the criminally insane. Viewers know her better as Esther, the name
she adopts after her violent escape in William Brent Bell’s Orphan: First Kill,
which releases today in theaters and on-demand.
Dr.
Novotny kept warning his staff to always be on their guard when around the
little monster, but they just didn’t listen. A few bloody murders later, Leena
finds a photo online of Esther Albright, a missing American girl she can pass
herself off as, due to the passage of time and a bogus Russian kidnapping yarn.
Of course, Albright’s sensitive artist father Allen is so overcome with joy, he
unquestioningly accepts everything she says. However, Tricia Albright knows there
is something wrong with her story and their child psychologist also notices
some inconsistencies.
Make
no mistake, Mother Albright is one tough customer. People are always so dumb in
horror movies, but not her, no siree. Esther is a master manipulator, but she
will have a harder time pulling-off her Bad Seed-esque head-games with Ms.
Albright than she did with Vera Farmiga in the first film. In fact, their cat-and-mouse
business is what makes First Kill so much fun.
It
is pretty amazing Isabelle Fuhrman can still play Esther, over ten years after
the first film released. Admittedly, she had some SFX help, but there is also
something about the character’s sinister nature that encourages the suspension of
disbelief in this respect. Yet, Julia Stiles’s performance as Albright is what
really makes the film work so well. She is sharp and witheringly funny. As a
result, she and Esther are pretty evenly matched, which actually builds the
kind of tension and suspense that is hard to get from prequels (because let’s
face it, logic already tells us exactly what will happen).
Peacock's Undeclared War has some so-so personal melodrama, but its realistic depiction of Russian cyberwarfare and toxic propaganda makes it required viewing. Epoch Times exclusive review up here.
It is weirdly fun to compare and contrast this film with Noel Marshall’s
infamous Roar. In that film, Tipi Hedren’s actual family pretended not
to be scared-to-death of the very real lions, rough-housing around them. In this
new film, Idris Elba’s fake family make-believes they are absolutely terrified
of the CGI lion stalking them. The production of the latter was obviously much
more responsible. The law of the jungle still remains harsh and unforgiving in
Baltasar Kormakur’s Beast, which opens this Friday.
Dr.
Nate Samuels’ family is going through a rough patch. After he and his wife
separated, she soon was diagnosed with cancer and quickly succumbed. For his
daughters, Mere and Norah, it was definitely a case of “bad optics.” To heal
their family unit, Samuels brought them back to his wife’s ancestral home in
Africa, where the couple’s mutual friend, Martin Battles works as a wildlife
ranger (and possibly an underground anti-poaching activist).
Battles
thought he would take them out on a nice photo-safari. Instead, they stumble
across a village that had been decimated by a rogue lion. That would be the big
one that escaped the poaching gang during the prologue. Uncharacteristically,
he keeps ripping and gnashing his prey, without stopping to feed, because he is
mean-mad with mankind, so when he sees the Samuels’ range rover, he starts
hunting them too.
Beast
certainly
has an environmental message, but it is a worthy, focused point. Tragically,
there has been a surge in lion poaching, to meet the demand for increasingly
rare tiger bones, which are used as an unfounded remedy for impotence in regional folk “medicine.” This is an illegal trade China (supposedly Africa’s best
friend) could surely curtail, but the CCP isn’t doing that at all. Maybe the
big cat should pay them a visit.
Regardless,
there is no question the big guy is the star of Beast and the CGI
animating him looks surprisingly lifelike. Its movements are convincingly realistic
and his behavior is suitably ferocious to create tension and suspense. However,
the film never really instills any “personality” in him, beyond a
vengeance-hungry killing machine.
This film makes “sparing a square” look like not such a big favor after all—not
that there is any toilet paper in this disgusting rest-stop bathroom. Hungover
Wes isn’t making it any cleaner, either, but his neighbor in the adjoining
stall will really make things messy in Rebekah McKendry’s Glorious,
which premieres tomorrow on Shudder.
Wes
was on the road, missing his ex, Brenda, but she wasn’t taking his calls. In
retrospect, it was probably a mistake to get blind, stinking drunk at the lonely
rest-stop and then burn his pants in a bonfire, but it apparently seemed like
the thing to do at the time. As a result, he is in pretty bad shape when the
voice of Farmers Insurance starts talking to him from the stall next door. There
happens to be a hole in the wall, but it cautions him not to look, claiming its
appearance would drive Wes mad.
The
voice Wes will call Ghat claims to be something truly Lovecraftian and it
certainly seems to have that kind of supernatural powers. Forr one thing, Ghat
can get inside of Wes’s head, interrupting the memories he tries to retreat
into. It wants something from Wes, and only Wes. Nobody else is invited to Ghat’s
party.
Glorious
is
often pretty gross, but also pretty clever. McKendry deftly exploits the claustrophobia
of the setting and its inherent ickiness. What really makes the film though is
J.K. Simmons, whose voice is absolutely perfect for the commanding, yet weirdly
ingratiating Ghat. This is probably the best voiceover performance of the year,
even including most animated films.
Ryan
Kwanten is similarly well-cast as the depressed and degenerate Wes. Just
looking at him makes you want to take an Alka Seltzer. He also presumably
carried on a pretty intense one-sided conversation, given Ghat’s crazy talk
must have been recorded separately. Professionals do that all the time, but he
had to reach some manic extremes.
Ironically, a crime spree can give a sense of urgency and momentum to life.
Initially, Val and Kevin figured they had nothing to lose, except their lives,
which they were tired of, so why not end it all by going a little outlaw?
Perhaps a fresh perspective will change their minds, or perhaps not in Jerrod
Carmichael’s On the Count of Three, premiering tomorrow on Hulu.
Kevin
has been miserable all his life, for many reasons, starting with Dr. Brenner,
who molested him when he was a young boy. Val isn’t much happier, but he doesn’t
have as many excuses. Nevertheless, he wants to end it all too, so he springs
his friend from the psychiatric hospital, where he was committed after his
recent suicide attempt. Val wants them to do the job right, by simultaneously
shooting each other in the head. Kevin is not against it, but he wants to
celebrate their last day together first, possibly by settling some scores. Dr.
Brenner is at the top of his list, but Val might also want to visit the father
who did him wrong.
At
this point, the film and all its promotional materials are covered with trigger
warnings and referrals for counseling help. That is all well intentioned and
maybe a little of it is helpful, but society managed to survive Hal Ashby’s Harold
and Maude and Burt Reynolds’ The End. We should be able to weather
this film as well. Frankly, a little dark humor can be cathartic and healing.
There
is some here (especially when it skewers Kevin’s kneejerk woke, anti-gun rights
politics), but screenwriters Ari Katcher and Ryan Welch really should have
cranked up the mordant attitude much higher. Too often, they focus on the sad
and tragic (which are usually less therapeutic). However, Lavell Crawford and
Tiffany Haddish both deliver some sharply cutting lines. The support work in Count
is first-rate, including Henry Winkler, who will shock and even scar those
who grew up with him on Happy Days, with his coldly manipulative
performance as Dr. Brenner.
Sometimes, on-the-job training is better career prep than advanced course work.
Murder-for-hire colud be one of those vocations. It seems to suit Chisato
Sugimoto and Mahiro Fukagawa, despite their conflicting Odd Couple personalities.
They are compatible professionally, but their employer also insists they room
together in Yugo (Hugo) Sakamoto’s high body-count comedy Baby Assassins,
which releases today on VOD.
Sugimoto
is cute and bubbly, whereas Fukigawa is a withdrawn self-avowed sociopath.
Together, they have a knack for killing, but holding down their
company-mandated part-time cover jobs is a different story, especially for Fukigawa.
Unfortunately, their latest target was Yakuza-connected, which displeases the
boss, Ippei Hamaoka. Only he should be able to kill his people. As part of his
female-centric makeover of his gang, Hamaoka instructs his daughter Himari to
find and eliminate the killers.
Eventually,
matters escalate into a full-blown war between the Yakuza and the two clueless
high school grads. However, it is more likely the two roommates will kill each
other before Hamaoka’s enforcers can get their act together. This is a comedy,
but Sakamoto is not fooling around when it comes to the action. There are some
brutal, no-holds-barred fight scenes and plenty of headshot-style executions.
It almost feels like a Miike film, but it is lighter, leaner, and more
down-to-business focused.
Josephine Baker was not always topless when she performed in the iconic banana
skirt, so it really isn’t cheating to depict in some sort of bikini top. Be
honest, when you see a graphic novel biography of Baker for ages 7-10, isn’t
your first question how they depict her vintage Parisian costumes (or lack
thereof)? Parents who are fans can certainly supplement as they see fit, but
those who are also concerned about the premature sexualization of their
children shouldn’t object to anything in Lauren Gamble’s It’s Her Story: Josephine
Baker, illustrated by Markia Jenai, which goes on-sale today.
Gamble
does indeed follow the chronological facts of Baker’s life, including her
triumph in Paris, her clandestine service with the French resistance during the
German occupation, and her support of the American Civil Rights movement. Someone
should really write a separate book about her work as a spy, because it is such
an intriguing historical episode, but at a kid-friendly 48 pages, Gamble’s bio
does not have the time or space to get sidetracked.
The
only real problem is the clunky dialogue, which unnecessarily echoes the
sentiments of the descriptive captions. They are mostly declarative or condemning
statements that do little to humanize Baker. Young kids are smart, they can
handle a little humor and nuance.
Regardless,
Jenai’s art is colorful and vibrant, capturing the elegance and extravagance of
Baker’s stage career. Some panels would make great posters, if the dialogue
balloons were stripped out. It is also nice to see them drop Ethel Waters’ name—we
can always hope the young readers will look her up too.
Harry Orwell had a cool name, but the title of his series didn’t use the best
part. He was also a little older and a lot more broken down than most TV
detectives of his era, but that made him a credible jazz fan. His taste puts
him in the right jazz club, at the right time, to help a legendary trumpeter in
the “Sound of Trumpets” episode of Harry O, directed by John Newland (the
host and director of One Step Beyond), which airs late night
Saturday, as part of Decade TV’s weekend binge.
Art
Sully (born Arthur Daniels) played with the greats, but it has been a while. He
was just paroled after serving more than ten years for a dubious murder charge.
He happens to crash Ziggy’s set at Orwell’s favorite Santa Monica jazz club and
then crashes at Orwell’s pad. When he comes to, he “borrows” the MG that spent
the better part of the series in the repair shop (MGs were like that). Despite
his annoyance, the thugs that come looking for Sully convince Orwell to help
the musician. He is also moved by the concern of Chuck Henry, another jazz legend,
and Sully’s daughter, Ruthie Daniels, an up-and-coming vocalist.
By
this time, the setting of Harry O had already moved from San Diego to
LA/Santa Monica, which meant all the time Orwell spent on the bus was
particularly sad. The shift probably paid off, since Anthony Zerbe won an Emmy
playing Orwell’s reluctant police contact, Lt. K.C. Trench. Based on this
episode, Zerbe and star David Janssen had an amusing bickering-bantering rhythm going
on. Of course, LA was also a more logical setting for a jazz story.
Although
the specific musicians are not credited, this episode was scored by the preeminent
bop trombonist J.J. Johnson, who knew everybody. For this episode, he used a
lot of percussion motifs. Among the guest stars, Cab Calloway was of equal or
possibly even greater stature, playing the decent and dignified Henry (an
Ellington-esque figure), with his showman-like charm.
Brenda
Sykes, who played Ruthie Daniels, also had important jazz connections, as the wife
of vocalist Gil Scott-Heron. Frankly, it is a shame she did not record more,
because she performs a nice jazzy rendition of “What is this Thing Called Love”
and a more R&B-ish (but maybe even more distinctive) version of “Never My
Love.” Plus, there is a one-armed former trumpeter turned pawnbroker, who must
have been inspired by Wingy Manone.
Da Vinci is one of the major reasons why we have the term “Renaissance man,”
because he was one of the originals (and one of the most important). Yet, he
hardly ever finished anything. At least that is the impression viewers get from
his latest episodic series treatment. Creators Frank Spotnitz & Steve Thompson
focus more on the intrigue, scandal, and ambiguous sexual orientation, which is
surely why it was acquired by the CW, where it premieres tomorrow.
Leonardo
Da Vinci is keenly aware of his illegitimacy and the sense of abandonment he
carries all his life. Nonetheless, his middle-class notary father helped him
attain an apprenticeship under Andrea del Verrochio. Not surprisingly, the
student’s promise soon shows the potential to eclipse the master. Da Vinci’s
work even attracts an offer of patronage from Ludovico Sforza, the Duke of
Milan, whom Da Vinci rashly turns down, out of loyalty to Verrochio.
During
his apprentice years, Da Vinci also forges an unusual relationship with Caterina
de Cremona, a lowly servant, with ambitions many would consider well beyond her
station. They do not exactly sleep together, because Spotnitz and Thompson
clearly suggest that just isn’t Da Vinci’s thing. However, they still have a
deeply felt, but highly tumultuous relationship. In fact, as the series opens,
Da Vinci stands accused of her murder by Stefano Giraldi of the Milan constabulary.
The truth will be revealed in flashbacks, prompted by his interrogations.
Admittedly,
Da Vinci’s body of work is frustratingly limited compared to many of his
contemporaries, but Leonardo often makes him look like a serial
procrastinator. Dan Brown fans will also be annoyed Spotnitz and Thompson never
show him incorporating any Fibonacci sequences into his masterworks. The new
series at least halfway accurately chronicles the major events of the Da Vinci
historical record, especially compared to David Goyer’s Da Vinci’s Demons.
However, the way the latter portrayed Leonardo as a carousing degenerate was
much more entertaining than the humorless angst of Aidan Turner (from the new Poldark)
this time around.
Nonetheless,
Turner generates more than enough brooding and sexual confusion to keep the
melodrama chugging along. Eventually, he and Matilda De Angelis (playing de
Cremona) develop some intriguing chemistry together. Of course, James D’Arcy is
reliably arrogant as the villainous Ludovico. The real problem is Freddy
Highmore is badly miscast as the intrepid Giraldi. The part needed someone like
Tim Roth, who can play it convincingly sly and cynical, before rediscovering
his idealism, thanks to Da Vinci’s art. Highmore just wasn’t up to it, but he
was an executive producer, so he was a fact of life.
This particular virus really was fake news. That is why it was so heroic and ingenious.
After the German occupation of Rome in 1943, until its Allied liberation, a
handful of doctors and supporting staff maintained the secret “K” ward, where
they sheltered Jews, who were supposedly suffering from a completely fictitious
virus. Documentarian and film score composer Stephen Edwards chronicles their courageous
efforts in Syndrome K, which releases tomorrow on VOD.
Fatebenefratelli
Hospital was Catholic by affiliation and ownership title. Yet, the Jewish Dr.
Vittorio Sacradoti made a professional home there before the Germans invaded
and a literal home during the occupation. He also found sympathetic colleagues
in the senior physician, Dr. Giovani Borromeo and Dr. Adriano Ossicini, who was
already active in the anti-Fascist underground. Together, they devised the Syndrome
K deception, as a means to shelter Jewish Italians, shrewdly exploiting the
National Socialists’ phobic obsessions with disease and impurity.
They
also harbored resistance figures on a short-term basis and provided communications
support to the underground. Since they were literally owned by the Church, it
is highly likely Pope Pious XII was aware to some extent of their activities,
which he apparently approved, at least passively.
In
fact, Edwards devotes a good deal of time to analyzing the controversial Pope’s
actions in response to Hitler and the Holocaust. Rather than attacking or
defending, Edwards and his on-camera experts are surprisingly evenhanded. While
the Pope still gets mixed-to-negative marks, the rank-and-file priests and nuns
who sheltered Roman Jewry throughout the city get their due credit. As a
result, this is a film that should really bring people together and inspire
good fellowship.
Claude Ridder is not your typical time-traveling hero, but he was a fitting
protagonist for Alain Resnais, the late surrealist filmmaker, who was often
associated with the French New Wave, despite never fully identifying with the
movement. In fact, Resnais’s take on time-travel film could represent the
ultimate Nouvelle Vague film, because of its radically fractured approach to
time. After consenting to serve as a human guinea pig in a time-traveling
experiment, Ridder finds himself uncontrollably reliving brief snippets of his
life in Resnais’s Je T’Aime, Je T’Aime (I Love You, I Love You),
which is definitely worth re-watching in honor of the filmmaker’s recent centennial.
Ridder
is a pitiable fellow in many ways. He still works as a shipping clerk at a
Parisian publishing house, due to his chronic lack of ambition. Ridder also
just survived a suicide attempt. Rather symbolically, he tried to shoot himself
through the heart. Yet, his rather cavalier attitude towards life is what
attracts the Crispel Research Center.
As
the various blandly bureaucratic scientists explain to Ridder, they
successfully sent mice back in time for one minute and then returned them
safely. Of course, mice cannot discuss the experience, so they wish to recruit
him to be their first human test subject. Ridder does not have any good reason
to decline, so he agrees.
Much
to everyone’s alarm, something goes wrong with the process this time. Ridder
keeps randomly “quantum leaping” into past episodes of his life, many of which
involve his troubled relationship with Catrine, who struggled with depression until
her early demise. At various times, Resnais leads the audience to suspect
something definitely transpired between them that contributed to her death and his
suicide attempt.
Resnais’s 1968 film is often considered a source of inspiration for Eternal
Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, but it is worth noting Je T’Aime, Je
T’Aime also predates Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Slaughterhouse-Five and
the subsequent George Roy Hill film adaptation. It certainly constitutes a
fractured narrative, by any standard or measure. As Ridder endures the shuffle-play
of his sad history for viewers to watch, each jump gets shorter, with surreal
imagery starting to intrude into what had appeared to be an otherwise mundane
existence.
Arguably,
Resnais’s narrative approach was considerably ahead of the other genre films of
its era. However, the scenes in the Crispel Center have a cold, sterile vibe
reminiscent of classic 1960s science fiction films like Jean-Luc Godard’s Alphaville
and Dr. Heywood Broun’s early sequences in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
That coldness is similarly reflected in the characters, especially Ridder, who
is standoffish and often rather self-sabotaging. Likewise, Catrine is usually
moody and distant—or at least that is how he remembers her.
Resnais
demands the audience’s full attention, by revisiting key incidents from
different perspectives, at slightly earlier or later time-frames. It might look
repetitive, but there are nuances to pick up on. Ultimately, when it all comes
together, it lands with devastating emotional force.