After Who Wants to Be a Millionaire the set design for gameshows has gotten
fancier and flashier, but the questions have gotten steadily dumber. Take for
instance The Wheel, if it still streams on Peacock after NBC canceled
it. This one has all the sweeping spotlights, but the questions are a little
different. An ability to recognize patterns will help you quite a bit if you
are a contestant on the new American adaptation of creators Andy Auerbach &
Dean Nabarro’s The 1% Club, which premieres Thursday on Prime Video,
before later airing on Fox, starting June 3rd.
Charles
Van Doren had his issues, but he was a learned man, so it would be interesting
to see him compete on a show like this. The set-up ought to outrage all those
critics of The Bell Curve, because it presupposes a distribution of intelligence,
but, of course, it makes no demographic assumptions therein. 100 contestants
are given $1,000 to risk on a series of questions. According to statistical
surveys, 90% of Americans answer the first question correctly. The next
question should have an 80% success rate, steadily diminishing down to the
titular 1%, for a share of a pot that could potentially be as large as $100,000.
These
are not trivia questions or applied mathematics. There might be a bit of
reading comprehension involved in early questions, but most depend on logic and
the analysis of sequences. You could well be smarter than the participants, but
you really have to watch. If you merely half-listen while multi-tasking, you
will not see the sequences or spatial relationships the problems refer to.
This
is somewhat different concept for a gameshow that clearly worked quite well in
the UK, where the franchise originated, before spawning international editions
in Australia, Israel, Germany, France, and now the USA (with future editions
coming soon to Ukraine and several other nations). Evidently, there is an app that
will allow viewers to play along. Yet, it doesn’t seem like it would be as fun to
watch with others as Fox’s The Floor, which probably had most of its
viewers blurting out answers as soon the images flashed across the screen.
We do a terrible job teaching civics in the United States. When I say
terrible, I mean absolutely pitiful. If you did not already suspect as much,
this new game show will convince you. There is definitely room for a new
high-end quiz show in the tradition of Jeopardy. This isn’t it, but to
be fair, the participants probably suffer from dizziness induced by its human
roulette wheel format in creator-host Michael McIntyre’s The Wheel, the
American version of which premieres tonight on NBC.
McIntrye
has already had great success with the first three seasons of the original Wheel
in the UK. That is also why McIntyre is hosting the American version, instead
of Ryan Seacrest, or whoever. The structure is kind of clever. Six celebrity judges
are seated around the titular wheel and a randomly selected contestant pops up
from the middle. Each celeb functions as an expert in a given category. The
contestant choses a category and “turns off” whomever they think knows the
least about the subject. When the wheel spins, if it lands on the “canceled”
celeb, they lose their turn, but if it lands on the specialist, they win
double, if together they come up with the right answer.
Of
course, many of the categories are about inconsequential fluff like Beyonce
Knowles. When the category is something legitimate, like “elections,” the
results can get ugly—really ugly. They also lack a regular “expert” the show
can rely on for a snarky quip, like Paul Lynde, the perennial center square on Hollywood
Squares. On the first three episodes provided for review, pro-wrestler and
star of The Marine franchise Mike “The Miz” Mizanin probably
displays the slyest humor. Someone like Ben Stein could really add a lot to the
show, with his quick wit and command of what should be considered general
knowledge, but he probably wouldn’t be down for the spinning.
There was a time when gameshows featured panelists like Dorothy Kilgallen and
Bennett Cerf, who would have been welcomed at any proper society dinner party.
Then the Quiz Show scandal happened and game shows started to lean into
dumb. The level of intelligence improved when they started recruiting comedians,
who can at least think on their feet. This latest bit of primetime gameplay is based
on a long-running British series, but it is also sort of a throwback to the
original To Tell the Truth. However, there are no average Joe contestants
nor money at stake. Only pride and bragging rights are on the line in Would
I Lie to You?, which premieres Saturday on the CW.
The
format is pretty simple. Celebrity contestants take turns reading a purportedly
true anecdote from their lives off a note card, allowing the opposing team to
ask questions to determine whether it is the truth or a lie. Eventually, in a
later round, each team member tries to explain their unlikely connection to a prop-person,
staring out at the camera with a blank expression—and again only one of them is
telling the truth.
Frankly,
based on the first three episodes, the host, Aasif Mandvi (who was great in the
series Evil) is the funniest of all the participants, so far. On the
other hand, it is rather telling former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s internal
lie-detector only works about 50% of the time, at best—but that doesn’t
necessarily mean his team didn’t still win, not that it really matters.